2017
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2017.1341251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class Imagery and Subjective Social Location During Iceland’s Economic Crisis, 2008–2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The steep rise in income inequality in Iceland in the decade leading up to the Great Recession of 2008 was the result of a neoliberal fiscal policy, but its decrease was due to the concurrent impact of income loss among top earners and government tax and welfare policy aimed at protecting low‐income groups (Olafsson & Kristjansson, ). Interestingly, despite the recession, Icelanders seem to have viewed the society to become more egalitarian and an upward shift in own subjective social location (Oddsson, ). Thus, Icelanders may have experienced an increase in social cohesion facilitated by the shared adversity of the economic crisis (Bernburg, , ), which in turn may contextualize the link between income inequality and emotional problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steep rise in income inequality in Iceland in the decade leading up to the Great Recession of 2008 was the result of a neoliberal fiscal policy, but its decrease was due to the concurrent impact of income loss among top earners and government tax and welfare policy aimed at protecting low‐income groups (Olafsson & Kristjansson, ). Interestingly, despite the recession, Icelanders seem to have viewed the society to become more egalitarian and an upward shift in own subjective social location (Oddsson, ). Thus, Icelanders may have experienced an increase in social cohesion facilitated by the shared adversity of the economic crisis (Bernburg, , ), which in turn may contextualize the link between income inequality and emotional problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to a tendency across societies to locate oneself in the middle of the social hierarchy (Evans & Kelley, 2004;Hout, 2008), objective and subjective status often do not converge. Several studies have attempted to explain this divergence (Andersen & Curtis, 2012;Lamont, 1992;Lindemann & Saar, 2014;Oddsson, 2018) and its consequences in fields such as health (Adler et al, 2000) and political preferences (Sosnaud, Brady, & Frenk, 2013;Zhang, 2008). We move this literature forward by incorporating a discussion and empirical examination of the effects of status inconsistency on omnivorousness.…”
Section: Implications Of Status Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, SSS is a more open subjective positioning criterion because it does not exclude other factors relevant to demarking group boundaries and hierarchizing (Karlsson, 2017). Second, class identity measurements could suffer from bias due to their highly political content (Oddsson, 2018). Third, the debate around the appropriateness of using classes as categories of analysis could invalidate the theoretical pertinence of the subjective beliefs about social position.…”
Section: Implications Of Status Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iceland is a small, homogenous, and egalitarian country (population 325,000) (Hreinsson, 2005; Tomasson, 1980); a social-democratic welfare state with comparatively low levels of income inequality and high rates of social mobility (Jónsson et al, 2001; Ólafsson, 1999; Thorlindsson, 1988). Most Icelanders identify as ‘middle class’ (Oddsson, 2010) and strongly believe that theirs is a ‘middle class society’ (Larsen, 2016; Oddsson, 2017), which encourages comparisons across income and occupational groups.…”
Section: Class Position Opportunity Beliefs and Subjective Status Inmentioning
confidence: 99%