Civil Society and Deliberative Democracy: Have Voluntary Organisations Faded from National Public Politics?

Abstract

The political context of civil society in Western Europe has changed dramatically in recent decades. These changing circumstances may produce a decline in the integration of civil society into political life – especially deliberative activities at the national level. This article discusses how serious these alleged threats are to a hitherto vital civil society – that of Sweden. It focuses on fours indicators of organised civil society's contribution to deliberative democracy. First, have efforts to contact politicians, public servants and the media, as well as participation in public debates, decreased? Second, has civil society directed interest away from national arenas and instead concentrated resources in local and/or supranational arenas? Third, is there any evidence of a withdrawal from public activities, such as public debates and media activities in favour of direct contacts with politicians and public servants? Fourth, has civil society become more professionalised in the sense that interest groups are increasingly hiring professional consultants? Two surveys conducted in 1999 and 2005 show that Swedish organised civil society has not faded from national public politics. However, growing public participation is almost exclusively connected to increasing communication via the mass media and direct contact with politicians. Taking part in open public debate has not increased. The national arena has marginally lost some importance. Moreover, there is an increasing tendency to hire professional lobbying consultants. This might improve the quality of civil society's contributions to public deliberation, but a more elitist civil society might also develop, which is uninterested in social dialogue.

The Rise of Citizen Groups? The Mobilization and Representation of Danish Interest Groups, 1975–2010

“…Major interest groups such as trade unions and employer organizations collaborated closely with politicians and public bureaucrats in shaping the contours of the Scandinavian welfare states (Rokkan ; Öberg et al ). Yet over the last several decades, there is evidence of large‐scale changes in the composition of civil society as well as in the role of interest groups in the political system (Amnå ; Lundberg ; Öberg & Svensson ). New client groups, representing groups such as patients, have proliferated (Amnå , 15; Fisker ), corporatist institutions have ruptured and the mediatization of politics has contributed to changed patterns of interaction between interest groups and policy makers (Binderkrantz & Christiansen ).…”

Injured but Not Yet Dead: A Bottom-Up Perspective on the Swedish Governmental Commissions

“…In an altered and more complex political landscape with increased global interdependency and multiple actors operating at various institutional levels (Bache & Flinders, 2004) However, from a sociological institutional perspective, the results speak towards relative stability of the governmental commissions. The increasing steering of the governmental commissions and prevalence of lobbying (Öberg & Svensson, 2012) and informal network institutions has not completely ousted interest organizations' faith in the governmental commissions as a relatively legitimate and appropriate policymaking institution. One key to this understanding seems to be its relatively formalized and predictable procedure.…”

Corporatism and Social Trust: Bringing Voluntary Organizations ‘Back In’

“…In Denmark and in Sweden as well, a growing part of the welfare state is administered at the local level. Presumably, this is an important reason for the growth in local corporatism (Ö berg & Svensson, 2012).…”