Cingulate Cortex and Pain Architecture

158

Models aiming to explain causally the evolutionary or ontogenetic emergence of the pallial isocortex and its regional/areal heterogeneity in mammals use simple or complex assumptions about the pallial structure present in basal mammals and nonmammals. The question arises: how complex is the pattern that needs to be accounted for in causal models? This topic is also paramount for comparative purposes, since some topological relationships may be explained as being ancestral, rather than newly emerged. The mouse pallium is apt to be reexamined in this context, due to the breadth of available molecular markers and correlative experimental patterning results. We center the present essay on a recapitulative glance at the classic theory of concentric mammalian allo‐, meso‐, and neocortex domains. In its simplest terms, this theory postulates a central neocortical island (6 layers) separated by a surrounding mesocortical ring (4–5 layers) from a peripheral allocortical ring (3 layers). These territories show additional partition into regional or areal subdivisions. There are also borderline amygdalar, claustral, and septal areas of the pallium, nuclear in structure. There has been little effort so far to contemplate the full concentric ring model in current “cortex patterning” models. In this essay, we recapitulate the ring idea in mammals (mouse) and consider a potential causal patterning scenario using topologic models. Finally, we briefly explore how far this theory may apply to pallium models proposed recently for sauropsids.

Section: Some Molecular Markerssupporting

confidence: 75%

Section: Graphic Models Of the Concentric Ring Organization Of The Pamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Omission Of the Mesocortex In Cortex Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Topologic Modeling Of Cortical Pattern and Patterningmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Concentric ring topology of mammalian cortical sectors and relevance for patterning studies

Puelles

Alonso

Garcı́a-Calero

et al. 2019

158

“…3) for parasagittal sections. Cortical lamination was delineated according to Swanson (2004) and Zilles (1985) with an appropriate reference to Vogt (2015) and to Vogt and Paxinos (2014) for the cingulate areas.…”

Section: Antibodies For Gfp and Mrfpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual mediodorsal thalamic neurons project to multiple areas of the rat prefrontal cortex: A single neuron‐tracing study using virus vectors

Kuramoto

Pan

Furuta

et al. 2016

The prefrontal cortex has an important role in a variety of cognitive and executive processes, and is generally defined by its reciprocal connections with the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD). The rat MD is mainly subdivided into three segments, the medial (MDm), central (MDc), and lateral (MDl) divisions, on the basis of the cytoarchitecture and chemoarchitecture. The MD segments are known to topographically project to multiple prefrontal areas at the population level: the MDm mainly to the prelimbic, infralimbic, and agranular insular areas; the MDc to the orbital and agranular insular areas; and the MDl to the prelimbic and anterior cingulate areas. However, it is unknown whether individual MD neurons project to single or multiple prefrontal cortical areas. In the present study, we visualized individual MD neurons with Sindbis virus vectors, and reconstructed whole structures of MD neurons. While the main cortical projection targets of MDm, MDc, and MDl neurons were generally consistent with those of previous results, it was found that individual MD neurons sent their axon fibers to multiple prefrontal areas, and displayed various projection patterns in the target areas. Furthermore, the axons of single MD neurons were not homogeneously spread, but were rather distributed to form patchy axon arbors approximately 1 mm in diameter. The multiple-area projections and patchy axon arbors of single MD neurons might be able to coactivate cortical neuron groups in distant prefrontal areas simultaneously. Furthermore, considerable heterogeneity of the projection patterns is likely, to recruit the different sets of cortical neurons, and thus contributes to a variety of prefrontal functions. J. Comp. Neurol. 525:166-185, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Immunolocalization of muscarinic M1 receptor in the rat medial prefrontal cortex

Oda

Tsuneoka

Yoshida

et al. 2018

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been considered to participate in many higher cognitive functions, such as memory formation and spatial navigation. These cognitive functions are modulated by cholinergic afferents via muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Previous pharmacological studies have strongly suggested that the M1 receptor (M1R) is the most important subtype among muscarinic receptors to perform these cognitive functions. Actually, M1R is abundant in mPFC. However, the proportion of somata containing M1R among cortical cellular types, and the precise intracellular localization of M1R remain unclear. In this study, to clarify the precise immunolocalization of M1R in rat mPFC, we examined three major cellular types, pyramidal neurons, inhibitory neurons, and astrocytes. M1R immunopositivity signals were found in the majority of the somata of both pyramidal neurons and inhibitory neurons. In pyramidal neurons, strong M1R immunopositivity signals were usually found throughout their somata and dendrites including spines. On the other hand, the signal strength of M1R immunopositivity in the somata of inhibitory neurons significantly varied. Some neurons showed strong signals. Whereas about 40% of GAD67‐immunopositive neurons and 30% of parvalbumin‐immunopositive neurons (PV neurons) showed only weak signals. In PV neurons, M1R immunopositivity signals were preferentially distributed in somata. Furthermore, we found that many astrocytes showed substantial M1R immunopositivity signals. These signals were also mainly distributed in their somata. Thus, the distribution pattern of M1R markedly differs between cellular types. This difference might underlie the cholinergic modulation of higher cognitive functions subserved by mPFC.