The manuscript describes the “digital transcriptome atlas” of the developing mouse embryo, a powerful resource to determine co-expression of genes, to identify cell populations and lineages and to identify functional associations between genes relevant to development and disease.

Models aiming to explain causally the evolutionary or ontogenetic emergence of the pallial isocortex and its regional/areal heterogeneity in mammals use simple or complex assumptions about the pallial structure present in basal mammals and nonmammals. The question arises: how complex is the pattern that needs to be accounted for in causal models? This topic is also paramount for comparative purposes, since some topological relationships may be explained as being ancestral, rather than newly emerged. The mouse pallium is apt to be reexamined in this context, due to the breadth of available molecular markers and correlative experimental patterning results. We center the present essay on a recapitulative glance at the classic theory of concentric mammalian allo‐, meso‐, and neocortex domains. In its simplest terms, this theory postulates a central neocortical island (6 layers) separated by a surrounding mesocortical ring (4–5 layers) from a peripheral allocortical ring (3 layers). These territories show additional partition into regional or areal subdivisions. There are also borderline amygdalar, claustral, and septal areas of the pallium, nuclear in structure. There has been little effort so far to contemplate the full concentric ring model in current “cortex patterning” models. In this essay, we recapitulate the ring idea in mammals (mouse) and consider a potential causal patterning scenario using topologic models. Finally, we briefly explore how far this theory may apply to pallium models proposed recently for sauropsids.

Conventional anatomic models of the rodent (mammalian) amygdala are based on section planes oblique to its intrinsic radial glial organization. As a result, we still lack a model of amygdalar histogenesis in terms of radial units (progenitor domains and related radial migration and layering patterns). A radial model of the mouse pallial amygdala is first offered here, based on three logical steps: (1) analysis of amygdalar radial structure in variously discriminative genoarchitectonic material, using an optimal ad hoc section plane; (2) testing preliminary models with experiments labelling at the brain surface single packets of radial glia processes, to be followed into the ventricular surface across intervening predicted elements; (3) selection of 81 differential amygdalar gene markers and checking planar and radial aspects of their distribution across the model elements. This approach shows that subtle changes to the conventional schema of the amygdala allow a radial histogenetic model to be recognized, which is consistent with molecularly coded differential identities of its units and strata. It is expected that this model will help both causal studies of amygdalar developmental patterning and comparative evolutionary studies. It also may have potential impact on hodological and functional studies.

We focus this report on the nucleus of the lateral olfactory tract (NLOT), a superficial amygdalar nucleus receiving olfactory input. Mixed with its Tbr1-expressing layer 2 pyramidal cell population (NLOT2), there are Sim1-expressing cells whose embryonic origin and mode of arrival remain unclear. We examined this population with Sim1-ISH and a Sim1-tauLacZ mouse line. An alar hypothalamic origin is apparent at the paraventricular area, which expresses Sim1 precociously. This progenitor area shows at E10.5 a Sim1-expressing dorsal prolongation that crosses the telencephalic stalk and follows the terminal sulcus, reaching the caudomedial end of the pallial amygdala. We conceive this Sim1-expressing hypothalamo-amygdalar corridor (HyA) as an evaginated part of the hypothalamic paraventricular area, which participates in the production of Sim1-expressing cells. From E13.5 onwards, Sim1-expressing cells migrated via the HyA penetrate the posterior pallial amygdalar radial unit and associate therein to the incipient Tbr1-expressing migration stream which swings medially past the amygdalar anterior basolateral nucleus (E15.5), crosses the pallio-subpallial boundary (E16.5), and forms the NLOT2 within the anterior amygdala by E17.5. We conclude that the Tbr1-expressing NLOT2 cells arise strictly within the posterior pallial amygdalar unit, involving a variety of required gene functions we discuss. Our results are consistent with the experimental data on NLOT2 origin reported by Remedios et al. (Nat Neurosci 10:1141–1150, 2007), but we disagree on their implication in this process of the dorsal pallium, observed to be distant from the amygdala.