Blood Pressure Measurements 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72423-7_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronobiologic blood pressure assessment with a cardiovascular summary, the sphygmochron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The family history risk score is 2.5 for one woman with systolic CHAT (which is more than two standard deviations above the mean), 1.25 for another woman with systolic CHAT (which is almost one standard deviation above the mean) and 0.5 for one of the men with diastolic CHAT. This is noteworthy if we take into account the statistically significant relationship between the double amplitude of SBP and the family history score observed herein and in earlier studies (Halberg, Bakken, et al, 1990;Halberg, Cornelissen, et al, 1998;Otsuka, Cornelissen& Halberg, 1996;Otsuka, Cornelissen, Halberg&Oehlert, 1997).…”
Section: • « *» --supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The family history risk score is 2.5 for one woman with systolic CHAT (which is more than two standard deviations above the mean), 1.25 for another woman with systolic CHAT (which is almost one standard deviation above the mean) and 0.5 for one of the men with diastolic CHAT. This is noteworthy if we take into account the statistically significant relationship between the double amplitude of SBP and the family history score observed herein and in earlier studies (Halberg, Bakken, et al, 1990;Halberg, Cornelissen, et al, 1998;Otsuka, Cornelissen& Halberg, 1996;Otsuka, Cornelissen, Halberg&Oehlert, 1997).…”
Section: • « *» --supporting
confidence: 71%
“…2) Double circadian amplitude of SBP increases with the presence of a family history of cardiovascular disease and/or high BP (P= 0.01), a statistically highly significant observation in earlier studies on other populations (Cornelissen, Kopher, et al, 1989;Cornelissen, Otsuka, et al, 1993;Halberg, Bakken, et al, 1990;Halberg, Cornelissen, Halberg, et al, 1998;Halberg, Cornelissen, Schwartzkopff, et al, 2005;Halberg, Cornelissen, Wall, et al, 2002;Otsuka, Cornelissen& Halberg, 1996;Otsuka, Cornelissen, Halberg& Oehlert, 1997;Scarpelli, Gallo& Chiari, 2000;Scarpelli, Marz, Cornelissen, Romano& Livi, 1985;Wan, Wang, Cornelissen& Halberg, 1994 ).…”
Section: • « *» --mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The BP and HR data were stored in the monitors' memory and downloaded to a personal computer at the end of the 7 days. The procedures followed by the subjects have been used by a wide range of individuals in several other research studies [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%