1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81387-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal reallocation of the chicken c‐myb locus and organization of 3′‐proximal coding exons

Abstract: In the course of our studies concerning the tissue-specific expression of the c-my6 proto-oncogene, we have established the nucleotide sequence of the chicken c-myb 3'-proximal coding exons. In situ hybridization performed with different genomic DNA probes corresponding to nearly all the c-myh gene allowed us to localize the corresponding locus on the large acrocentric chromosome 3 in chicken. Our sequencing data also indicate that the 3'-proximal noncoding sequences represented in c-myb mRNA species are deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaw et al (1991) and Tereba et al (1991) have located the genes for growth hormone and aromatase, respectively, to the q arm of Chromosome 1. The newer fluorescent probe methods are now being used in chickens for the location of cloned genes by several groups (Soret et al, 1990;Dominguez-Steglisch et al, 1990, 1991, 1992aHutchison and LeCeil, 1992;Li and Ponce de Leon, 1992; N. J. Hutchison and C. LeCeil, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia St., Seattle, WA 98104, personal communication; F. A. Ponce de Leon, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaw et al (1991) and Tereba et al (1991) have located the genes for growth hormone and aromatase, respectively, to the q arm of Chromosome 1. The newer fluorescent probe methods are now being used in chickens for the location of cloned genes by several groups (Soret et al, 1990;Dominguez-Steglisch et al, 1990, 1991, 1992aHutchison and LeCeil, 1992;Li and Ponce de Leon, 1992; N. J. Hutchison and C. LeCeil, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia St., Seattle, WA 98104, personal communication; F. A. Ponce de Leon, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these cases, the oncogenic activation of c-myb results in the expression of truncated MYB proteins deprived of the casein kinase II phosphorylation site and of the 5Ј-proximal (R1) DNA-binding repeat which has been proposed to play a role in the restricted transforming potential of c-myb (38,43,62). According to the previously established nomenclature (72), the RAV-1 insertion occurred upstream from c-myb exons 3 (33) and 2 (60) in B-cell lymphomas. The RAV-1 insertional activation of c-myb in T9 cells results in the expression of a 66-kDa C-MYB protein which is deprived of sequences encoded by exons 1 to 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%