1989
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6699.606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesterol screening programmes: how much potential benefit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Assuming a 20% reduction in CHD with treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in all age and sex groups, the estimated number of women needing to be treated to prevent one coronary event within five years is greater than for men the same age. 13 …”
Section: Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Assuming a 20% reduction in CHD with treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in all age and sex groups, the estimated number of women needing to be treated to prevent one coronary event within five years is greater than for men the same age. 13 …”
Section: Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the benefits of screening are relatively rare, and the numbers needed to screen are large. For example, the number of men who need to be screened for raised cholesterol concentration to prevent one death from heart disease within five years range from 21 067 for men aged 25-34 to 231 for men aged 55-64, and the numbers are greater for women 18. For cervical screening, an estimated 1000 women need to be screened for 35 years to prevent one death from cervical cancer 24…”
Section: Developing and Using Decision Aids For Screening Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would cost 100 times as much to prevent one heart attack by cholesterol screening in 40-year-old women than it would in 60-year-old men. 2 The third principle is that "screening for a multifactorial disease should be multifactorial." For cholesterol screening, this means that the aim should not be to identify those with the highest cholesterol values but rather to identify those with the highest cholesterol-associated risk because they are the ones who will derive the most benefit from intervention.…”
Section: Prevention In Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%