China and the WTO: Will the Market Economy Status Make Any Difference after 2016?

Urdínez, Francisco; Masiero, Gilmar

doi:10.1080/10971475.2015.993228

Cited by 32 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During the period studied, Chinese manufactures were subject to numerous antidumping investigations. Industrial chambers and political parties expressed their concerns over a damaged national industry, and Chinese manufacturing imports became an issue for political deliberation (Urdinez and Masiero 2015).…”

Section: Research Design and Data Gatheringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014

Urdínez

Mouron

Schenoni³

et al. 2016

Lat. Am. polit. soc.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If one interprets China's sizable rise in Latin America as an unprecedented phenomenon, it follows that the concurrent story of declining U.S. influence in the region is an event hastily acknowledged at best and ignored at worst. In this article, we ask whether Chinese economic statecraft in Latin America is related to the declining U.S. hegemonic influence in the region and explore how. To do so we analyze foreign direct investments, bank loans, and international trade from 2003 to 2014, when China became a major player in the region. We use data from 21 Latin American countries, and find that an inversely proportional relationship exists between the investments made by Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs), bank loans, manufacturing exports, and the U.S. hegemonic influence exerted in the region. In other words, Beijing has filled the void left by a diminished U.S. presence in the latter's own backyard.

show abstract

Section: Research Design and Data Gatheringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014

Urdínez

Mouron

Schenoni³

et al. 2016

Lat. Am. polit. soc.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the beginning of the 1980s, China applied tariff barriers to control the imports" volume into her local market. The most important milestone of China"s trade happened in 2001 when they joined the WTO through which a country has to modify and revise her administrative regulations and trade law (Urdinez and Masiero, 2015); (Tahir and Khan, 2014); (Wang et al, 2013) to convert the global atmosphere of "China threat" to "China opportunity" Tai and Soong (2014). Over the period of 2001-2016, China experienced an average of 50.98 per cent trade openness which depicts a higher level of the trade relations with the other nations.…”

Section: China's Trade Pattern With Opecmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Panel Data Analysis of Chinas Trade Pattern with OPEC Members: Gravity Model Approach

Irshad

Xin

Shahriar

et al. 2018

Asian Economic and Financial Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article History JEL Classification:N70, C23, F13In this study, we have endeavoured to explain China"s trade pattern with OPEC member countries by employing gravity model over the period . The estimation results demonstrate that the gravity equation fits the data pragmatically. China was the first biggest oil importer worldwide with about 73 per cent of her oil coming from OPEC member countries. In fact, energy can be considered as the most traded commodity and also the core reason for the trade volume growth between China and the OPEC member countries in last two decades. We have confirmed that China"s bilateral trade with OPEC members positively impacts on GDP, income (GDP per capita), trade openness in China and the WTO member countries in OPEC. While negatively influence on distance (trade cost) and supports Linder hypothesis. Depreciation in bilateral exchange rates also negatively influence on China"s bilateral trade with OPEC. Contribution/ Originality:To the best of the authors" knowledge, this study is the first attempt to examine the China"s trade pattern with 14 OPEC member countries aver the period of 1990-2016 through gravity approach by estimation technique OLS and time fixed effects.

show abstract

“…20 We should know that WTO members launched anti-dumping against China mainly because the price of China's export product is too low, which brought negative impact on their domestic industries. Typically, take the 'mouse phenomenon' as example, a wireless mouse that values $40 only pays merely $3 to the assembly plant in Suzhou, China.…”

Section: (For Enterprise)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis on article 15 of China accession protocol after expiration

Yan¹

2017

Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2017, with the expiration of Article 15 in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the issue of China's full market economy status has received significant attention from public and government. This paper makes an objective interpretation of the content about Article 15 in Protocol and the identify rules of market economy status, reversing the misunderstanding. Finally, we summarize the current situation on basis of all above analysis, then give strategies and recommendations related to government or enterprise.

show abstract

China and the WTO: Will the Market Economy Status Make Any Difference after 2016?

Cited by 32 publications

References 18 publications

Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014

Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014

A Panel Data Analysis of Chinas Trade Pattern with OPEC Members: Gravity Model Approach

Analysis on article 15 of China accession protocol after expiration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About