2019
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3551871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

cherab/core: Release v1.2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Power deposition profile along the LFS target. Contribution from radiative processes was calculated with the CHERAB code [33]. As discussed in the main text, the artifact visible close to the separatrix does not influence any of the results discussed in the paper.…”
Section: Detachment Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(b) Power deposition profile along the LFS target. Contribution from radiative processes was calculated with the CHERAB code [33]. As discussed in the main text, the artifact visible close to the separatrix does not influence any of the results discussed in the paper.…”
Section: Detachment Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We estimate that most of this inconsistency is due to a non-perfect convergence of the energy equations. Residual analysis reveals oscillations which [33]. (b) Power deposition profile along the LFS target.…”
Section: Detachment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the quarterpellet SPIs into degraded H-mode shows good impurity assimilation and radiation fraction. Moreover, the radiation heat flux onto the first wall is obtained by the Raysect/CHERAB code suite integrated within integrated modelling & analysis suite (IMAS) [25,26] and their energy impact is calculated. It is found that the maximum energy impact for the full pellet dual-SPI into the baseline H-mode case exceeds the tolerable limit of the stainless steel near the injector, but stays well below that of the tungsten.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%