The Eagle Ford Shale
DOI: 10.1306/13541965m1103664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemostratigraphic Variability of the Eagle Ford Shale, South Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, quartz in Eagle Ford Shale is known as mixture of detrital and authigenic (mainly biogenic and volcanic) quartz (e.g. Tinnin and Darmaoen, 2016;Milliken et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2018) . Although this irregular behaviour of quartz and plagioclase is troublesome, estimation of terrestrial input from Zr and Ti seems to be effective way to understand mineral composition roughly because both main brittle component (calcite) and ductile component (clay) were strongly controlled by the supply from landscape.…”
Section: Well Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, quartz in Eagle Ford Shale is known as mixture of detrital and authigenic (mainly biogenic and volcanic) quartz (e.g. Tinnin and Darmaoen, 2016;Milliken et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2018) . Although this irregular behaviour of quartz and plagioclase is troublesome, estimation of terrestrial input from Zr and Ti seems to be effective way to understand mineral composition roughly because both main brittle component (calcite) and ductile component (clay) were strongly controlled by the supply from landscape.…”
Section: Well Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have also been utilized to estimate sediment-water interface oxygenation (paleo-redox) conditions of Eagle Ford sediments and abundances of Ni, Cu, etc. are thought to represent organic C sinking flux (frequently referred to as paleo-productivity) (Tribovillard et al, 2006;Driskill et al, 2012;Moran, 2012;Rowe et al, 2013;Denne et al, 2014;Eldrett et al, 2014;Boling, 2015;Fairbanks et al, 2016;Tinnin et al, 2016) . Therefore, total organic carbon is predictable in use of these elements and Hart et al (2019) calculate TOC with good accuracy to measured TOC (r 2 = 0.747) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%