2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cheating more when the spoils are split

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
202
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
202
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Any anagram reported as solved thus constituted cheating. This measure was adopted from prior research and it is widely used as a measure of cheating (e.g., DePalma, Madey, & Bornschein, 1995;Eisenberger & Leonard, 1980;Eisenberger & Masterson, 1983;Eisenberger & Shank, 1985;Shmueli & Muraven, 2007;Wiltermuth, 2010). To minimize suspicion, we selected anagrams of common English words and we changed only one letter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any anagram reported as solved thus constituted cheating. This measure was adopted from prior research and it is widely used as a measure of cheating (e.g., DePalma, Madey, & Bornschein, 1995;Eisenberger & Leonard, 1980;Eisenberger & Masterson, 1983;Eisenberger & Shank, 1985;Shmueli & Muraven, 2007;Wiltermuth, 2010). To minimize suspicion, we selected anagrams of common English words and we changed only one letter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, when the benefits of lying do not clearly outweigh those of honesty in the eyes of the target, prosocial lies can harm trust and moral judgments, and communicating benevolent intent may do little to mitigate these negative effects (Lupoli, Levine, & Greenberg, 2017). Other work has focused on predictors of prosocial lying: Research reveals that people are more likely to lie when others stand to gain (Gino, Ayal, & Ariely, 2013;Gino & Pierce, 2009;Wiltermuth, 2011), and prosocial lying is observed even when there is a cost to the self (Erat & Gneezy, 2012). Thus far, however, no work has examined what is likely a critical antecedent of prosocial lying: emotion, and in particular, the emotion of compassion.…”
Section: Prosocial and Selfish Lyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have explored what makes people act dishonestly by focusing on social and moral preferences (Biziou-van-Pol, 2015;Levine & Schweitzer, 2014;Levine & Schweitzer, 2015;Shalvi & de Dreu, 2014), incentives (Dreber & Johannesson, 2008;Erat & Gneezy, 2012;Fischbacher & Föllmi-Heusi, 2013;Gneezy, 2005;Kajackaite & Gneezy, 2015;Mazar, Amir & Ariely, 2008;Sutter, 2009), the role of group-serving lies versus individual-serving lies (Cohen, Gunia, Kim-Jun & Murnighan, 2009;Conrads, Irlenbusch, Rilke & Walkowitz, 2013;Gino, Ayal & Ariely, 2013;Wiltermuth, 2011), and the role of manipulating cognitive resources (Gino, Schweitzer, Mead & Ariely, 2011;Shalvi, Eldar & Bereby-Meyer, 2012;Gunia et al, 2012;van't Veer, Stel & van Beest, 2014;Capraro, 2017). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%