2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing patterns of scoring and ties in competitive sports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the popularity and substantial commercial value of competitive sports, the internet has carried out data statistics on all kinds of basketball matches, given the performance of each team, and ranked the teams. e game followers often evaluate the strength of the group according to the victory and defeat ranking or divide the unity strength according to their own intuition and preferences [1][2][3]. However, because of the different logarithmic strength of the team that has competed and as the score difference between the winner and the loser of each competition has not been considered, the winning rate cannot correctly reflect the strength of the team.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the popularity and substantial commercial value of competitive sports, the internet has carried out data statistics on all kinds of basketball matches, given the performance of each team, and ranked the teams. e game followers often evaluate the strength of the group according to the victory and defeat ranking or divide the unity strength according to their own intuition and preferences [1][2][3]. However, because of the different logarithmic strength of the team that has competed and as the score difference between the winner and the loser of each competition has not been considered, the winning rate cannot correctly reflect the strength of the team.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the experts suggested that it would be more relevant if the trend was linked to scoring difference and set period. Accordingly, Jeon and Park [ 84 ] considered performance trends as a consequence of random processes associated with each action. In contrast, Stanimirovic and Hanrahan [ 78 ] found that positive trends in the scoreboard or “momentum” were associated with psychological effects that affect performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%