2008 Digest of the IEEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meetings 2008
DOI: 10.1109/leosst.2008.4590521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the impact of non-linear effects in coherent transmission experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the -factor is always better at 100 GHz, but this effect is more evident for DQPSK ( 2 dB) than for 40/80G PDM-QPSK ( 1 and 0.3 dB, respectively). This is probably due to the fact that increasing the channel spacing does not reduce nonlinear depolarization [10]. A possible solution to improve PDM-QPSK robustness against SPM and XPM is to improve the phase estimation algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the -factor is always better at 100 GHz, but this effect is more evident for DQPSK ( 2 dB) than for 40/80G PDM-QPSK ( 1 and 0.3 dB, respectively). This is probably due to the fact that increasing the channel spacing does not reduce nonlinear depolarization [10]. A possible solution to improve PDM-QPSK robustness against SPM and XPM is to improve the phase estimation algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the optical filter also gives a spectral shaping to the phase [31], it is sufficient to restrict the range of integration to the bandwidth of the optical filter [10]. Also, it can be shown that , so that finally the variance expression simplifies to (7) Note that, when we can approximate , then from (23) and thus from (5) we get (see Appendix III): which is the approximate expression used by Ho ([10], (9), where is assumed). Such an approximation, while reasonable at 100 GHz channel spacing, becomes more critical at 50 GHz spacing.…”
Section: A Dqpskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the evolution of transmission technologies and the increase of data traffic, optical networks have continuously adopted faster interfaces, today offering bit rates of 10 Gb/s and 40 Gb/s, with 100 Gb/s already widely reported in research and development laboratories [7,9,10]. At the same time, photonic networks are able to manage hundreds of wavelengths through a single optical fiber carrying data traffic in the range of terabits per second.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%