2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiome of farmed juvenile and adult white Cachama (Piaractus brachypomus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the most abundant bacterium was Cylindrosper-mopsis of HTPC (11%); Microcystis of JTPC (7%); Synechococcus of ATPC (11%); Paludibacter of HTGC (9%); Microcystis of JTGC (20%); Arcobacter of ATGC (23%). We can see that the annotated bacteria of different classifications in different growth stages of different culture environments have significant differences, which are extremely consistent with the actual breeding situation [50,51]. Meanwhile, the Archaea in HTPC (0.1%), JTPC (0.06%), and ATPC (0.06%) as well as Euryarchaeota in HTGC (0.8%) and ATGC (0.3%) and the Archaea in JTGC (0.6%) were also found by using KRONA software annotation ( Figure 3A-F).…”
Section: Annotation Analysis Of the Microbiotasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The results showed that the most abundant bacterium was Cylindrosper-mopsis of HTPC (11%); Microcystis of JTPC (7%); Synechococcus of ATPC (11%); Paludibacter of HTGC (9%); Microcystis of JTGC (20%); Arcobacter of ATGC (23%). We can see that the annotated bacteria of different classifications in different growth stages of different culture environments have significant differences, which are extremely consistent with the actual breeding situation [50,51]. Meanwhile, the Archaea in HTPC (0.1%), JTPC (0.06%), and ATPC (0.06%) as well as Euryarchaeota in HTGC (0.8%) and ATGC (0.3%) and the Archaea in JTGC (0.6%) were also found by using KRONA software annotation ( Figure 3A-F).…”
Section: Annotation Analysis Of the Microbiotasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…c_Epsilonproteobacteria.o_Campylobacterales.f_Campylobacteraceae.g_Arcobacter of ATGC (23%). We can see that the annotated bacteria of different classi cations in different growth stages of different cultured environments have signi cant differences, which are extremely consistent with the actual breeding situation (Castañeda-Monsalve et al, 2019;. Meanwhile, the Archaea in HTPC (0.1%), JTPC (0.06%), and ATPC (0.06%) as well as euryarchaeota in HTGC (0.8%) and ATGC (0.3) and the archaea in JTGC (0.6%) were also found by using KRONA software annotation (Fig.…”
Section: Annotation Analysis Of the Microbiotasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, snails of different sizes could also use different strategies when fed on the same macrophyte species [ 60 ]. Bacterial microbiota from juvenile and adult snails were significantly different in precious reports in which the changes of the microbiota were observed at different developmental stages of the aquatic animals, such as southern catfish ( Silurus meridionalis ) and white cachama ( Piaractus brachypomus ) [ 63 , 64 ], proposing that as the aquatic animal transits through youthhood to adulthood, the microbiota drifts, even when the environment remained constant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%