Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers

Abstract

Particle emissions from multiple fused deposition modeling consumer 3D printers were systematically quantified utilizing an established emission testing protocol (Blue Angel) to allow quantitative exposure assessments for printers operating in different environments. The data are consistent with particle generation from volatilization of the polymer filament as it is heated by the extruder. Typically, as printing begins, a burst of new particle formation leads to the smallest sizes and maximum number concentrations produced throughout the print job. For acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filaments, instantaneous concentrations were up to 10 6 #/cm 3 with mean particle sizes of 20 to 40 nm when measured in a well mixed 1 m 3 chamber with 1 air change per hour. Particles are continuously formed during printing and the size distribution evolves consistent with vapor condensation and particle coagulation. Particles emitted per mass of filament consumed (particle yield) varied widely due to factors including printer brand, and type and brand of filament. Higher extruder temperatures result in larger emissions. For filament materials tested, average particle number yields ranged from 7.3 £ 10 8 to 5.2 £ 10 10 g ¡1 (approximately 0.65 to 24 ppm), with trace additives apparently driving the large variations. Nanoparticles (diameters less than 100 nm) dominate number distributions, whereas diameters in the range of 200 to 500 nm contribute most to estimated mass. Because 3D printers are often used in public spaces and personal residences, the general public and particularly susceptible populations, such as children, can be exposed to high concentrations of non-engineered nanoparticles of potential toxicity. EDITORJing Wang

Three-dimensional printing with nano-enabled filaments releases polymer particles containing carbon nanotubes into air

“…Peak number concentrations up to 10 7 particles/cm 3 were observed in chamber testing, indicating all filaments, regardless of additives, emitted a large number of particles during printing. In general, peak number concentrations for ABS and PLA base polymers were consistent with peak concentrations reported in the literature and summarized by Zhang et al . Calculated yield and ER values between pairs of filament types were mostly similar.…”

Comparison of 3D printed nose bolus to traditional wax bolus for cost‐effectiveness, volumetric accuracy and dosimetric effect

“…Printing parameters included a layer height of 0.2 mm, external perimeter thickness of 0.5 mm and top/bottom thickness of 0.8 mm, as per the default fast draft setting in Cura. Polylactic acid (PLA) was chosen as the printing material due to its reduced particle emission and ease of use . A duplicate was made for each 3D printed shell to check for printing reproducibility and conformity of fit, with the internal fill density varied from 100% to 18% to reduce print time (Fig.…”

“…9 The converted .stl file was then uploaded into the Cura Polylactic acid (PLA) was chosen as the printing material due to its reduced particle emission and ease of use. [10][11][12] A duplicate was made for each 3D printed shell to check for printing reproducibility and conformity of fit, with the internal fill density varied from 100% to 18% to reduce print time (Fig. 1D).…”

3D-Printed Lab-on-a-Chip Diagnostic Systems-Developing a Safe-by-Design Manufacturing Approach

“…Zhang et al [75] conducted a quantitative exposure assessment for six commercial FFF 3D printers during operation in different environments, in order to investigate particle emissions. The investigation involved three types of widely used filament materials (ABS, PLA, nylon).…”