1981
DOI: 10.1016/0165-2427(81)90034-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations in sheep by rosette formation, adherence to nylon wool and mitogen responsiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1981
1981
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few reports describing the lymphocyte subpopulations in normal sheep (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). We found that the rosettes formed with SRBC and ovine PBL are fragile but that fixation with glutaraldehyde allowed the identification of a higher percentage of rosette-forming ovine T cetls than reported previously (14).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…There are few reports describing the lymphocyte subpopulations in normal sheep (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). We found that the rosettes formed with SRBC and ovine PBL are fragile but that fixation with glutaraldehyde allowed the identification of a higher percentage of rosette-forming ovine T cetls than reported previously (14).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, this study underlines the validity and value of our use of the calculated elution pattern of each subpopulation, as an index of subpopulation adherence, a calculation which is inherently subject to vigorous backchecking because of the cellular 'balance sheet' involved. Since the initial description [9], the method has proved itself in this series and in studies of pig lymphocytes with a weak Fc receptor [4] and sheep lymphocyte subpopu lations [14], Technical parameters of the method have been discussed thoroughly elsewhere [9] but two fur ther points are noteworthy. Confirmation that sub population elution is not random was proved by our observation that 96% of NAD cells from a first co lumn loaded on a second column eluted in the NAD fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were made of: slg4 lymphocytes by immunofluorescence, Fc+ lympho cytes by rosette formation with bovine RBC sensitized with hyper immune pig antibody, E rosette-forming lymphocytes by rosette formation with SRBC in dextran (DS*) orsaline (S*) and Null cells using the formula Null% = 100 -(sIg*°/o + DS*%). E rosettes were separated preparatively by centrifugation at -400 g, on density lay ers (12% FicollTriosil) for I h at 4 0C and the lymphocytes released by ammonium chloride-Tris (ACT) lysis, exactly as for sheep lym phocytes [ 14]. Lymphocytes were separated on nylon wool columns for tissue culture or for analysis of subpopulation nylon-adherence as detailed previously for pig [4,9] and sheep [14] lymphocytes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations