1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00327085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of donor-directed antibody class in the post-transplant period using flow cytometry in renal transplantation

Abstract: Over the past few years there has been increasing awareness of the importance of humoral mechanisms in the rejection of renal transplants. In this study we have monitored the development of antibodies directed against donor T and B lymphocytes using the sensitive flow cytometric technique. Forty-two cadaveric renal transplants were studied both before and for a maximum of 14 days after transplantation. Donor cells were separated from spleen on the day of transplantation and stored in liquid nitrogen until requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, a significant proportion of these transplants fail-some because of nonimmunologic causes having to do with the quality of the kidney or recurrence of disease, others because of rejection resulting from allorecognition of donor incompatibilities. Potential incompatibilities may be due to different alleles of HLA-A, -B, and -DR loci, as discussed in the following section; differences in antigens at other HLA loci, such as HLA-C, -DQ and -DP; or other molecules not traditionally matched such as HLA class I heavy-chain molecules encoded by MICA [4,40,41].…”
Section: The Clinical Reality Of Hla Matchingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, a significant proportion of these transplants fail-some because of nonimmunologic causes having to do with the quality of the kidney or recurrence of disease, others because of rejection resulting from allorecognition of donor incompatibilities. Potential incompatibilities may be due to different alleles of HLA-A, -B, and -DR loci, as discussed in the following section; differences in antigens at other HLA loci, such as HLA-C, -DQ and -DP; or other molecules not traditionally matched such as HLA class I heavy-chain molecules encoded by MICA [4,40,41].…”
Section: The Clinical Reality Of Hla Matchingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pre‐transplant PRAs and donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies are both associated with impaired outcomes (69). Transplant recipients who develop anti‐HLA antibodies post‐transplant experience more rejection episodes (19, 64, 68, 70–75). In some studies, the magnitude of the rise in antibody levels was related to the severity of graft rejection (19, 71).…”
Section: The Range Of Antigens That Evoke Alloantibody Responses In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have indicated a 2-to 10-fold higher incidence of acute rejection in the presence of HLA antibodies [16,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. The CDC method is a functional test because it detects complement-fixing antibodies (immunoglobulin (Ig)-M, IgG1, and IgG3) and these antibodies have been regarded as detrimental to the graft [3].…”
Section: Role Of Hla Antibodies In Renal Allograft Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%