2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a type O foot-and-mouth disease virus re-emerging in the year 2011 in free areas of the Southern Cone of South America and cross-protection studies with the vaccine strain in use in the region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An FMD outbreak was detected in September 2011 in a bovine herd in the department of San Pedro in central Paraguay. The virus was classified as type O and belonged to the Europe-South America topotype of the FMD virus, and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that it was the same lineage of previous isolations made in the Southern Cone sub-region ( 14 , 15 ). The outbreak was controlled with measures including a stamping-out policy in addition to emergency vaccination in the control areas without the identification of secondary outbreaks associated with the index case.…”
Section: The 2011 Fmd Outbreaks In Paraguaysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…An FMD outbreak was detected in September 2011 in a bovine herd in the department of San Pedro in central Paraguay. The virus was classified as type O and belonged to the Europe-South America topotype of the FMD virus, and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that it was the same lineage of previous isolations made in the Southern Cone sub-region ( 14 , 15 ). The outbreak was controlled with measures including a stamping-out policy in addition to emergency vaccination in the control areas without the identification of secondary outbreaks associated with the index case.…”
Section: The 2011 Fmd Outbreaks In Paraguaysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In a vaccine challenge experiment involving pigs vaccinated with O/SKR/2010 vaccine no detectable amount of neutralising antibody was observed on 21 days post-vaccination (dpv) against O/ME-SA/PanAsia strain while only 60% animals exhibited neutralising antibody above 1:16 on 49 dpv and none of the animals was protected upon challenge with an O/ME-SA/PanAsia virus [34] indicating this vaccine not to be broadly cross-protective. However, high antigen payload vaccines have been shown to compensate poor vaccine match in serotype O [35] and A viruses [36] . The capsid sequences of this vaccine strain (O/SKR/2010) and the non-matching viruses were analysed further to understand the molecular basis of the antigenic mis-match, however no obvious antigenically critical amino acid substitutions were observed (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This virus belonged to local strains from the Euro‐SA topotype most closely related to O/Corrientes/Arg/06 (WRLFMD, ). Cross‐protection studies showed that Vaccine O1/Campos was not protecting against this virus in Paraguay (Maradei et al., ). In November 2013, Paraguay regained FMD‐free status, and since 2012, when the last FMD cases were reported by Paraguay, no further FMD outbreaks have been officially reported to the OIE or the RLN.…”
Section: Endemic Pools In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%