2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109202108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and adaptive optical correction of aberrations during in vivo imaging in the mouse cortex

Abstract: The signal and resolution during in vivo imaging of the mouse brain is limited by sample-induced optical aberrations. We find that, although the optical aberrations can vary across the sample and increase in magnitude with depth, they remain stable for hours. As a result, two-photon adaptive optics can recover diffraction-limited performance to depths of 450 μm and improve imaging quality over fields of view of hundreds of microns. Adaptive optical correction yielded fivefold signal enhancement for small neuro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
158
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(27 reference statements)
5
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6,7] AO microscopy has successfully been used to cancel the disturbances caused by cellular structures in wide-field microscopy, [8] laser-scanning confocal microscopy, [9,10] multi-photon microscopy, [11][12][13] harmonic generation microscopy, [14,15] and superresolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy, [16,17] with or without the wavefront sensor. [18] So far, most AO microscopy has observed artificial samples and animal tissues; plant cells and tissues have not been examined by AO microscopy yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7] AO microscopy has successfully been used to cancel the disturbances caused by cellular structures in wide-field microscopy, [8] laser-scanning confocal microscopy, [9,10] multi-photon microscopy, [11][12][13] harmonic generation microscopy, [14,15] and superresolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy, [16,17] with or without the wavefront sensor. [18] So far, most AO microscopy has observed artificial samples and animal tissues; plant cells and tissues have not been examined by AO microscopy yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of cranial windows has been paradigm shifting in neuroscience [2], the glass window introduces additional aberrations. In particular, light propagating through the glass window and the brain tissue accumulates spherical aberrations (SA) as these materials have a refractive index mismatch between themselves and with respect to the immersion media of standard objective lenses (e.g., air, water, oil) [3][4][5]. Several theoretical studies have modeled SA and their effects on image quality in confocal [6][7][8], widefield [8,9], confocal light sheet [10], and multiphoton [6] fluorescence microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies will be required to determine the optimal combination of NIR and SWIR wavelengths and powers for achieving the maximum fluorescence signal while avoiding tissue damage. Additional improvements in the excitation efficiency can be achieved by implementation of Adaptive Optics (AO) to correct the phase distortions experienced by the NIR beam [45][46][47]. Specifically, the SWIR beam, which can be focused deep inside the tissue, can be used as a reference point ("guiding star") allowing us to adjust the phase of the NIR beam to achieve the maximum spatial overlap of their focal volumes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%