2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of carbon-based nanofluids and their application in a brazed plate heat exchanger under laminar flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When SiO 2 -water nanofluid at a mass concentration of 0.2% was applied, the maximum heat transfer enhancement was achieved, while Al 2 O 3 -water nanofluid achieved the minimum heat transfer enhancement at a mass concentration of 0.1% [269]. The use of carbon-based nanofluids on brazed plate HX and its characteristic was investigated [270]. The results demonstrate a slight decrease in the pressure, while the heat exchange capacity and system efficiency factor were increased by 9.19% and 7.28%, respectively, at a mass concentration of 0.6%.…”
Section: Plate Heat Exchangersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When SiO 2 -water nanofluid at a mass concentration of 0.2% was applied, the maximum heat transfer enhancement was achieved, while Al 2 O 3 -water nanofluid achieved the minimum heat transfer enhancement at a mass concentration of 0.1% [269]. The use of carbon-based nanofluids on brazed plate HX and its characteristic was investigated [270]. The results demonstrate a slight decrease in the pressure, while the heat exchange capacity and system efficiency factor were increased by 9.19% and 7.28%, respectively, at a mass concentration of 0.6%.…”
Section: Plate Heat Exchangersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the cross-section of the THE in Figure 1, Re can be calculated using Equations ( 4)-( 7) [20,30,31]:…”
Section: Preparation Of Cbnfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, 1.0 wt% CBNF with 1.6 wt% GA was alternately dispersed using an electromagnetic stirrer (PC420D, Corning, Corning, NY, USA), an ultrasonic bath (5510R-DTH, Branson, St. Louis, MO, USA), a homogenizer (YOM300D, Yotec, Taiwan), and an ultrasonic liquid processor (Q700, Qsonica, Newton, CT, USA). The aforementioned dispersion method was repeated three times to keep superior stability for the CBNFs based on our past research experience [30,[33][34][35]. Next, 1.0 wt% CBNF with 1.6 wt% GA was further diluted with water to a final concentration of 0.05 wt% and 0.2 wt% CBNFs, and the ratio of GA to CBNMs in each CBNFs was fixed at 8:5.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cbnfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtained OHTC in this study varied in the range of 2123-4503 W/m 2 K. In a research done by Sarafraz et al [39], CuO/water nanofluid was tested in PHE with 36 plates and OHTC was obtained up to 12,000 W/m 2 K. In another work conducted by Variyenli [3], the performance of using fly ash nanofluid in PHE with 16 plates was analyzed and OHTC was obtained between 1400 and 2600 W/m 2 K. Teng et al [40] investigated the utilization of carbon-based nanofluid in PHE and found OHTC in the range of 2700-3300. Figure 10 shows HTC variation with Reynolds number in PHE with eight plates.…”
Section: Experimental Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%