No abstract

No abstract

In this study, the authors report the production of nanocomposite-enhanced phase-change materials (NEPCMs) using the direct-synthesis method by mixing paraffin with alumina (Al2O3), titania (TiO2), silica (SiO2), and zinc oxide (ZnO) as the experimental samples. Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO were dispersed into three concentrations of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 wt.%. Through heat conduction and differential scanning calorimeter experiments to evaluate the effects of varying concentrations of the nano-additives on the heat conduction performance and thermal storage characteristics of NEPCMs, their feasibility for use in thermal storage was determined. The experimental results demonstrate that TiO2 is more effective than the other additives in enhancing both the heat conduction and thermal storage performance of paraffin for most of the experimental parameters. Furthermore, TiO2 reduces the melting onset temperature and increases the solidification onset temperature of paraffin. This allows the phase-change heat to be applicable to a wider temperature range, and the highest decreased ratio of phase-change heat is only 0.46%, compared to that of paraffin. Therefore, this study demonstrates that TiO2, added to paraffin to form NEPCMs, has significant potential for enhancing the thermal storage characteristics of paraffin.

This study analyses the density and specific heat of alumina (Al 2 O 3 )/water nanofluid to determine the feasibility of relative calculations. The Al 2 O 3 /water nanofluid was produced by the directsynthesis method with cationic chitosan dispersant served as the experimental sample, and was dispersed into three concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 wt.%. This experiment measures the density and specific heat of nanofluid with weight fractions and sample temperatures with a liquid density meter and a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). To assess the availability of these equations, it then compares the experimental data with the calculated results according to the concepts of mixing theory and statistical mechanism. Comparing the calculated results of density and specific heat with the experimental data, the deviation of density fell within the range of À1.50% to 0.06% and 0.25% to 2.53%, whereas the deviation of specific heat fell within the range of À0.07% to 5.88% and À0.35% to 4.94%, respectively. Calculated results of density and specific heat show a trend of greater deviation with an increased concentration of nanofluid. However, two kinds of density and specific heat of the calculated results fall within an acceptable deviation range in this study.

No abstract