2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of freeze-dried wafers and solvent evaporated films as potential drug delivery systems to mucosal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, excess of plasticiser could result in higher free volume between polymers that are highly slippery and difficult to handle (very sticky) as shown in mechanical properties and SEM images of BK HPMC films obtained from polymeric solution with GLY above 2% w/v. Therefore a balance between flexibility and toughness with an optimum elongation ideally between 30-50% is desirable [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, excess of plasticiser could result in higher free volume between polymers that are highly slippery and difficult to handle (very sticky) as shown in mechanical properties and SEM images of BK HPMC films obtained from polymeric solution with GLY above 2% w/v. Therefore a balance between flexibility and toughness with an optimum elongation ideally between 30-50% is desirable [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Films are usually prepared by solvent evaporation method [9,10] while wafers are prepared by a sublimation process known as freeze-drying [11]. There has been research reported on the delivery of NIC via the buccal route using films [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the wafers had a higher mucoadhesion capacity compared to the films. Since wafers are porous in nature, they hydrate more quickly in the presence of mucin solution and form strong hydrogen bonding more quickly with the protein 42 . POL-CAR-BLK wafers showed the highest stickiness values (3.12±0.4 N) and lowest cohesiveness (2.48±0.3mm).…”
Section: Mucoadhesion Studies By Texture Analysis In the Presence Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the blank formulations, POL-CAR-BLK film showed slower diffusion of the mucin while the corresponding POL-CAR-BLK wafer showed a wavy diffusion profile which may be associated with the porous nature of the wafers which caused unequal distribution of mucin through these pore channels. Previously, Boateng and co-workers reported that wafers have the capacity to hydrate more quickly than their corresponding films 42 . The same trend was observed when comparing POL-SA-BLK film and wafer whilst diffusion was faster overall for both POL-SA-BLK films and wafers compared to their corresponding CAR containing formulations respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Blank Films and Wafersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot-melt extrusion [35][36][37] In hot-melt extrusion, A blend of pharmaceutical ingredients is molten.…”
Section: 92mentioning
confidence: 99%