1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-8111(96)90001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos theory as a model for managing issues and crises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
120
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…While the path to an outcome might be unpredictable, some of the outcomes will remain constant. For example, exactly predicting a person's political viewpoint on a specific issue might not be possible but it is possible to determine that person's underlying perspective over the long term (Murphy 1996). Chaotic systems assume the oxymoronic position of being determinant and unpredictable at the same time (Lucking 1991).…”
Section: Chaos Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the path to an outcome might be unpredictable, some of the outcomes will remain constant. For example, exactly predicting a person's political viewpoint on a specific issue might not be possible but it is possible to determine that person's underlying perspective over the long term (Murphy 1996). Chaotic systems assume the oxymoronic position of being determinant and unpredictable at the same time (Lucking 1991).…”
Section: Chaos Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They deal with crisis reasons and causes, bankruptcy, crisis management, company state estimation, bankruptcy prediction and its methods. Characteristics of crisis situation were analyzed by Augustine (1995); Ayres (1996); Booth (2000); Burn, Redwood (2003); Demirguc-Kunt, Detragiache (1998); Hart (1993) ;Hwang, Lichtenthal (2000); Milburn et al (1993); Ravid, Sundgren (1998); Rogov (2006) ;Jasilionienė, Tamosiunienė (2009); problems of crisis management were discussed in the works of Ashcroft (1997); Alas (2008) ;Boin, Lagadec (2000); Darling et al (1996); ; Davidavičienė (2008); Donoho (1994); Escarraz, Chong (1998); Fink (2002); Kurosheva (Курoшева 2002); Lalonde (2004); Maynard (1993);Milesi-Ferritti, Razin (1998); Mitroff (2005); Murphy (2006); Ponikvar (2009);Paraskev (2006); Parsons (1996); Pearson, Clair (1998); Ulmer et al (2007); Valackiene Virbickaite (2009); causes of crisis and bankruptcy in a modern company were dealt with by Argenti (2005); Birch (1994); Grigaravičius (2002); Kaminsky (1998); ; Martin (1991); Preble (1997); Ren (2000); Rosenblatt, Sheaffer (2002); Rosenthal, Charl...…”
Section: Scientifi C Analysis Object Is the C Oncept Of Crisis Situatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, several meta-analyses have provided empirical evidence to question the linearity assumption between personality traits and job performance/turnover intentions (Tett, Jackson, Rothstein, & Reddon, 1999;Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002;Kaplan et al, 2009). Despite this observation few scholars have speculated that the near zero-order correlations observed could be due to nonlinearity (Murphy, 1996). Building on these speculations, the remainder of this paper offers a theoretical argumentation and tests the nonlinear character of the relationships of NA with job performance and turnover intentions.…”
Section: Literature Review Na and Its Relationship With Job Performanmentioning
confidence: 89%