2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/itst.2006.288714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Coding in Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MATLAB is used as our simulation tool for carrying out this analysis. We consider BCH (2047, 2036, 1), BCH (2047, 1992, 5), RS (255, 253, 1) and RS (255, 245, 5) for the comparison as BCH codes of length 2047 bits are suitable to be compared with RS codes of length 255 [30]. Parameter values mentioned in [23] and Table 1 are used for our analysis.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MATLAB is used as our simulation tool for carrying out this analysis. We consider BCH (2047, 2036, 1), BCH (2047, 1992, 5), RS (255, 253, 1) and RS (255, 245, 5) for the comparison as BCH codes of length 2047 bits are suitable to be compared with RS codes of length 255 [30]. Parameter values mentioned in [23] and Table 1 are used for our analysis.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an uncoded system is more energy efficient than a coded system in densely populated multi-hop WSN. Kashani and Shiva extend their work of [78] to [79] to compare the performance of RS, BCH, and convolutional code with different error correcting capabilities. The paper claims that RS code is the most energy efficient among them.…”
Section: Fec For Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though these algorithms improve link reliability and save power, none attempted such a thing before. Examples of such work are present in [2], [3], [4], [5] where multiple ECC algorithms are evaluated and proved to provide better performance compared to other techniques such as automatic repeat request (ARQ). ARQ system depends on retransmission and acknowledg ments which usually ends up consuming more power than power consumed in correcting errors.…”
Section: Ieoin 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we need to figure out how much energy is required by the decoder to decode the data. Since no actual sensor nodes were available, we estimated Erx at 0.54 nJ/bit using [2], [3]. To calculate the energy saving per bit that we gain from the use of ECC, we need to subtract the sum of E t x and Erx for RS code from E t x for the uncoded data.…”
Section: B Power Consumption Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%