2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61904-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing accommodation behaviour during multifocal soft contact lens wear using auditory biofeedback training

Abstract: Biofeedback training has been used to access autonomically-controlled body functions through visual or acoustic signals to manage conditions like anxiety and hyperactivity. Here we examined the use of auditory biofeedback to improve accommodative responses to near visual stimuli in patients wearing single vision (SV) and multifocal soft contact lenses (MfcL). MfcLs are one evidence-based treatment shown to be effective in slowing myopia progression in children. However, previous research found that the positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This multifocality and its influence on intermediate and near vision will obviously depend on pupil size, 34 retinal illuminance, 35 and other psychophysical factors such as tolerance to reduced contrast, photic phenomenon (glare, stray light, forward scatter), [36][37][38] and compromised stereopsis. 39 Furthermore, multifocal lens designs have been shown to influence the accommodative response in young nonpresbyopes, 40,41 and it is conceivable that a similar influence is seen on the accommodative and the cross-coupled vergence response of the patient undergoing refractive surgery, [42][43][44] at least up until the onset of presbyopia (typically over a decade for an average patient of keratorefractive surgery). 45 All these issues need further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multifocality and its influence on intermediate and near vision will obviously depend on pupil size, 34 retinal illuminance, 35 and other psychophysical factors such as tolerance to reduced contrast, photic phenomenon (glare, stray light, forward scatter), [36][37][38] and compromised stereopsis. 39 Furthermore, multifocal lens designs have been shown to influence the accommodative response in young nonpresbyopes, 40,41 and it is conceivable that a similar influence is seen on the accommodative and the cross-coupled vergence response of the patient undergoing refractive surgery, [42][43][44] at least up until the onset of presbyopia (typically over a decade for an average patient of keratorefractive surgery). 45 All these issues need further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training may cause a reduction of the accommodative lag, which can lead to a slowdown of myopia progression, 270 and may enhance the therapeutic effect of multifocal contact lenses in myopia control. 271…”
Section: Conclusion Contact Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accommodative stimulus–response varies at different viewing distances. The accommodative lag was quantified as the difference between the accommodative demand and response, and both the accommodative demand and lag increased as the viewing distance decreased [ 19 ]. Normal asymptomatic individuals have an accommodative lag of 0.50 ± 0.25 D during binocular accommodation at a 0.4 m distance [ 20 ]; however, accommodative lag is higher in people with myopia than those with emmetropia [ 8 , 18 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%