1967
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(67)90154-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in visual recovery functions and unit activity produced by frontal and temporal cortex stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N, com ponent is absent in more cases than in normal controls, the latencies be come longer, especially those of the initial components, and the DP is dis organized. Our results are thus in agreement with Spinelli and Pribram's [9] findings in monkeys. The influence of the temporal lobe lesion is homolateral, as well as contralateral, to the damaged lobe and has no re lation to the site of the lesion in the temporal areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The N, com ponent is absent in more cases than in normal controls, the latencies be come longer, especially those of the initial components, and the DP is dis organized. Our results are thus in agreement with Spinelli and Pribram's [9] findings in monkeys. The influence of the temporal lobe lesion is homolateral, as well as contralateral, to the damaged lobe and has no re lation to the site of the lesion in the temporal areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Spinelli and Pribram [9] showed the influence of the inferotemporal cortex on recovery function of the striate cortex. Vaughan and Gross [10] found no influence of lesions in the inferotem poral cortex on visual-evoked responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this experiment and others (Spinelli & Pribram, 1967;Skinner & Lindsley, 1967) suggest that activity in the frontal cortex influences both nonspecific and specific input to the cerebral cortex. Studies by Krauthamer & Albe-Fessard (1965) and Buser (1966) indicate that stimulation of the caudate nucleus may inhibit nonspecific input at thalamic levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…That central factors, neuronal or metabolic, are capable of modulating adaptation has been recently suggested. Frontal lobe stimulation in the monkey for example, changes the receptive field organization of retinal units in a manner analogous to dark adaptation (Spinelli & Pribram, 1966). Flicker fuSion in man is affected by intake of ethanol in a manner similar as by the onset of scotopic vision (Granger & Ikeda, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%