“…For this reason, the identification and representation of shale porosity and pore size distribution becomes one of the key parameters for commercial evaluation of shale (Chalmers et al., 2012; Furmann et al., 2014; Loucks et al., 2009; Mastalerz et al., 2013; Milliken et al., 2013; Ross and Bustin, 2009). Domestic and foreign scholars have adopted many qualitative means (including field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM), focused ion beam-SEM and atomic force SEM (Bernard et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2016; Ji et al, 2016) and quantitative means (including high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimetry, low-temperature N 2 /CO 2 gas adsorption method (Chalmers et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014), nano-CT scanning and image 3D reconstruction (Bai et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016), low-pressure nitrogen adsorption and helium porosity measurements can use to investigate the evolution of shale pore characteristics during comminution (Li et al., 2016)). In general, SEM is used to directly identify the type, shape, and size of pores (Bernard et al., 2012; Chalmers et al., 2012; Curtis et al., 2012; Kelly et al., 2015; Milliken et al., 2013; Tiwari et al., 2013), but it cannot identify mesopore and micropore (Zhang et al., 2015), with poor representativeness when measuring size distribution and geometry of pores (Zhu et al., 2016).…”