2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in soil organic carbon stocks under agriculture in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
87
2
26

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
87
2
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction in SOC pool in the present study by 23 % (3.95 Mg ha -1 ) and 15 % (2.62 Mg ha -1 ) for CLF and the CL, respectively, compared to NV are more than the values reported for an Oxisol in central Brazil by Zinn et al (2005). However, the SOC pool of 13.63 and 14.96 Mg ha -1 at the 0-10 cm depth for CLF and CL, respectively, are similar to those reported for degraded pasture by Carvalho et al (2010).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon Concentration and Poolcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Reduction in SOC pool in the present study by 23 % (3.95 Mg ha -1 ) and 15 % (2.62 Mg ha -1 ) for CLF and the CL, respectively, compared to NV are more than the values reported for an Oxisol in central Brazil by Zinn et al (2005). However, the SOC pool of 13.63 and 14.96 Mg ha -1 at the 0-10 cm depth for CLF and CL, respectively, are similar to those reported for degraded pasture by Carvalho et al (2010).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon Concentration and Poolcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This phenomenon was also discussed by Bayer et al (2011) in a study of soil in Rio Grande do Sul and by Zinn et al (2005) for Oxisol in the Cerrado biome region. These authors reported a correlation between C sequestration rates and the soil texture.…”
Section: Balancesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, the C stock in the 0-20 cm layer was 21.1 % greater for LVTA than for LVTM. This difference between soils was primarily related to the texture (Zinn et al, 2005). In contrast, in the surface layer (0-5 cm), no significant difference was observed in the C stocks of the two soils.…”
Section: Stockmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Soil C stocks in conventional tillage systems were generally smaller than in no-till systems. The lower SOC stocks in CT derive from the higher rates of decomposition of SOM in these systems (Lovato et al, 2004;Zinn et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%