2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Product Attributes and Costs as Drivers of New Product Diffusion and Substitution

Abstract: Diffusion theory has typically focused on how communication, internal or external to a social system, leads to adoptions and diffusion of an innovation. We develop a diffusion and substitution model based on a somewhat different perspective. In some cases, progressive improvements in product attributes and/or continual cost reduction seem to be a key driver of the diffusion process. For example, after introduction of the 5.25‐inch disk drive, its capacity continually increased, and accordingly, so did customer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that individuals influence each other's social values when they have discussions (Deffuant et al, 2005). Schmidt and Druehl, (2005) suggest a somewhat different perspective. They believe that adoption may progress due to changes in the product attributes, rather than because of communication attributes.…”
Section: Identifying Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that individuals influence each other's social values when they have discussions (Deffuant et al, 2005). Schmidt and Druehl, (2005) suggest a somewhat different perspective. They believe that adoption may progress due to changes in the product attributes, rather than because of communication attributes.…”
Section: Identifying Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One insight from the encroachment model Schmidt and Druehl 2008) is that the first customer to buy when diffusion occurs via high-end encroachment (sustaining innovations, including radical innovations; as discussed above, those customers are innovators in Rogers' (2003) sense) can be the last to buy when diffusion occurs via low-end encroachment (disruptive innovations). That is, even in the same marketplace, the very same customer can be either a laggard or an innovator, depending on whether the new product diffuses via low-end or high-end encroachment (Schmidt and Druehl 2005). This can again be seen as another proof that disruptive innovations are a relative phenomenon.…”
Section: Adoption and Deployment Of Disruptive Innovations For The Simentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This means that low-end encroachment is possible, even if the new product is initially high priced, if the new product opens up a new market segment that is in essence detached from the existing market (Schmidt and Druehl 2008: 359). Note, however, that high or low price is relative as it depends on the affordability and willingness to pay, i.e., the reservation price, of the customer (see also Schmidt and Druehl 2005 for a discussion of the impact of reservation prices in new product diffusion and substitution).…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Disruptive Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not consider competition nor do they allow for an adopter to leapfrog a generation of products. More recently, researchers have incorporated product or market variables into the Norton-Bass model to evaluate their impact on the development of successive generations of products, for example, [21,7,42,9] leading to extremely complex models and complicated data fitting procedures.…”
Section: Diffusion: the Bass Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%