2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between the first and second pregnancies and risk of large-for-gestational-age birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
60
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with those of Patel et al [22] and Richards et al [23]. There is a well-established association between macrosomia and maternal obesity [24], and a correlation between maternal BMI and mean birthweight [25]. In contrast, we observed more small for gestational age (SGA) neonates [26] in the RYGBP group than in both control groups (8.3%, 0.8%, and , respectively), although the trend was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…These results are consistent with those of Patel et al [22] and Richards et al [23]. There is a well-established association between macrosomia and maternal obesity [24], and a correlation between maternal BMI and mean birthweight [25]. In contrast, we observed more small for gestational age (SGA) neonates [26] in the RYGBP group than in both control groups (8.3%, 0.8%, and , respectively), although the trend was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…In a populationbased retrospective cohort analysis, women who were overweight or obese before their first pregnancy had increased adjusted odds for LGA, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery in their second pregnancy as compared to women who had a normal weight before both pregnancies, even if they had reached a normal weight by their second pregnancy. [7][8][9] While these findings suggest that prepregnancy BMI might have adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies, it is unclear if the increased risk is driven by recurrence of adverse outcomes in the first pregnancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Peu d'études d'intervention ont été publiées jusqu'à ce jour, mais plusieurs sont en cours. Par contre, des études rétrospectives observent que la perte de poids avant une grossesse restaure le cycle menstruel [42] et diminue les risques de prééclampsie, de macrosomie et de césarienne [43,44].…”
Section: Consultation Préconceptionunclassified