W e read with great interest the article titled "Changes in lid crease measurements in levator advancement for ptosis" by Alkeswani et al, 1 in which authors reported the change in eyelid crease measurements in levator advancement, also explaining preoperative planning to avoid overcorretion or undercorretion during ptosis surgery.This retrospective analysis is well written and interesting, especially by providing additional understanding to the esthetic value of the levator advancement procedure for blepharoptosis correction, but we have some elements to discuss.Even considering the complexity of this type of surgery, 13 patients represent a limited cohort for this type of study, because variability is minimal.We also published an article describing the role of marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) for the evaluation of the long-term outcomes for blepharoptosis correction, but to obtain standardized conditions for patients' evaluation, we used a chin and forehead support during primary gaze. 2 Did authors use any type of support to avoid minimal movements that could represent a bias for the study? 3 Moreover, the evaluation of this type of surgery by a single senior surgeon, in our opinion, seems reductive and could lead to statistical errors that could be reduced or avoided by recruiting a larger number of plastic surgeons, unaware of other results. 4,5 Considering that this type of study for the evaluation of surgical outcomes should take into consideration that minimal variations represents a large variability, how did the authors collect data and measure the MRD1 6 ?To conclude, this article represents a very interesting field for a very niche surgery, but further studies, with larger cohort of patients and a more extensive evaluation of the results, are suggested to reinforce the value of this research.