2002
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.123058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
26
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with a report by another investigator (Fox et al, 2010), who demonstrated that the change in CL over time is a significant predictor of SPTD, even in the absence of a short cervix. These observations were novel, but not unexpected because a previous study revealed that independent of the baseline CL, more rapid shortening of the cervix increases the risk of preterm birth (Naim et al, 2002). However, the current results are different from the findings of Gibson et al (Gibson et al, 2004) who showed that the change in CL from 18-24 weeks or 24-28 weeks has poor predictive value for SPTD prior to 35 weeks' gestation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with a report by another investigator (Fox et al, 2010), who demonstrated that the change in CL over time is a significant predictor of SPTD, even in the absence of a short cervix. These observations were novel, but not unexpected because a previous study revealed that independent of the baseline CL, more rapid shortening of the cervix increases the risk of preterm birth (Naim et al, 2002). However, the current results are different from the findings of Gibson et al (Gibson et al, 2004) who showed that the change in CL from 18-24 weeks or 24-28 weeks has poor predictive value for SPTD prior to 35 weeks' gestation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Recent studies involving singleton pregnancies have shown that a reduction in CL over time is associated with SPTD (Fox et al, 2007;Naim et al, 2002). However, with respect to twin pregnancies, there is limited data on the relationship between the change in CL and SPTD, and the RECEIVED 25 May 2011; ACCEPTED 1 February 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In Arjang Naim et al (2002) study, incidence of preterm delivery was 23% for cut off cervical length <30mm. 7 Variation in results of present study and other studies might be due to racial and ethnic factors. In other studies cut off values of cervical lengths are different and incidence of preterm deliveries considered for ≤ 32 weeks, ≤35 weeks and ≤ 36 weeks.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…[16][17][18][19] Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography has been shown to predict preterm birth in these asymptomatic high-risk women. 13,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Some studies have suggested that cervical length shortening by transvaginal ultrasonography may further increase the risk of preterm birth, 26,[29][30][31][32][33][34] whereas other studies have not noted this association. [35][36][37] There is a limited information regarding the benefit of follow-up cervical length ultrasound in high-risk asymptomatic women found to have a short cervical length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Many of these studies, however, evaluated low-risk women 29,30,32,34 or those with symptoms of preterm labor. 37 Several studies have evaluated cervical shortening in high-risk women finding conflicting results, with some suggesting it added additional predictive value, 26,31,33 whereas others found it did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%