2003
DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.6.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in Cognitive Function Over Time in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
178
6
24

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
17
178
6
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurodevelopmental disability in VLBW infants over the first few years of life has been shown to recover over time. 16 On the other hand, other disabilities can manifest as significant after the infants appeared normal during the first 3 years of life. Despite limitations, the results suggest that VLBW twins conceived by ART showed a different pattern of development compared to that of spontaneous twins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurodevelopmental disability in VLBW infants over the first few years of life has been shown to recover over time. 16 On the other hand, other disabilities can manifest as significant after the infants appeared normal during the first 3 years of life. Despite limitations, the results suggest that VLBW twins conceived by ART showed a different pattern of development compared to that of spontaneous twins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research findings have been inconsistent in this regard (Luciana, 2003), with some investigators proposing that very preterm children may "catch-up" with age because of neural plasticity and functional recovery (Ment et al, 2003). In contrast, others suggest that persistent impairments are more likely, with some children potentially showing greater impairment with increasing age .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diversidade de desfechos tem sido relacionada às condições ambientais que podem atenuar ou agravar as dificuldades comportamentais de crianças expostas a fatores de riscos biológicos relativos às condições de nascimento (Aylward, 2002;Ment et al, 2003;Sameroff & Fiese, 2005). Além disso, a análise da literatura da área aponta para as dificuldades de comparação dos estudos devido às diferenças nos delineamentos adotados (Milligan, 2010;Vanderbilt & Gleason, 2010), na idade de avaliação das crianças (Elgen, Sommerfelt, & Ellertsen, 2003;Ment et al, 2003;Zwicker & Harris, 2008), nos instrumentos de avaliação utilizados (Saigal, 2000) e nos critérios de estratificação das amostras (Msall & Park, 2008;Milligan, 2010;Sommerfelt et al, 2001).…”
unclassified