2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental outcome of very low birth weight twins conceived by assisted reproduction techniques

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the differences in developmental outcomes between very low birth weight twins conceived by assisted reproduction techniques and those conceived spontaneously.Study design: Twenty-two sets of very low birth weight twins were evaluated by the Kyoto Scale for Psychological Development at 36 months of corrected age. Total developmental quotient and developmental quotient (DQ) for three subscales, posture-motor, cognition-adaptation and language-social, were evaluated.Results: Twins conceived… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations within this study are that it did not describe the outcomes of full multiple sets, only the siblings within a multiple set if they met they met the criteria of having a birthweight of 1250 g. Birth order, growth discordance, chorionicity and in utero demise or fetal reduction were not assessed as potential determinants of outcome, although these factors can affect immediate perinatal outcomes [29][30][31][32][33][34] and even later neuromorbidity. 35 Some studies suggest a negative impact of ART on developmental outcomes, [36][37][38] but in our study the type of ART was not identified or linked to the individual cases and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Limitations within this study are that it did not describe the outcomes of full multiple sets, only the siblings within a multiple set if they met they met the criteria of having a birthweight of 1250 g. Birth order, growth discordance, chorionicity and in utero demise or fetal reduction were not assessed as potential determinants of outcome, although these factors can affect immediate perinatal outcomes [29][30][31][32][33][34] and even later neuromorbidity. 35 Some studies suggest a negative impact of ART on developmental outcomes, [36][37][38] but in our study the type of ART was not identified or linked to the individual cases and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In one study the children identified with CP or other adverse outcomes were excluded before further examination. 44 Fourteen studies assessed motor development, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] and 2 reported that children born as a result of ICSI (ICSI children) had a statistically significant higher risk of delayed motor development at 1 to 2 or 5 years of age, respectively. 44,57 Eleven studies assessed behavioral development 33,44,46,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64] ; 2 reported a statistically significant higher risk of delayed behavioral development in ICSI children aged 1 to 2 years 44 and IVF children aged 9 to 10 years, 58 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large population-based register study found an increased risk of behavioral problems in children born after IVF (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.11-2.74). 33 Nine studies assessed delay in cognitive development 43,45,51,54,[56][57][58]65,66 and 1 study reported that ICSI children had a statistically significant lower risk of delayed cognitive development at 8 years of age, while another study reported that ICSI children had a statistically significant higher risk of delayed cognitive development at 5 to 8 years of age. 65 Eleven studies assessed delay in mental development, 44,[46][47][48][49][50]52,[67][68][69][70][71] and 1 found less adverse outcomes in twins born as a result of assisted conception 71 while all other studies on developmental delay described non-statistically significant findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have shown a higher incidence of neuro-developmental impairment in twins conceived by ART as compared to naturally conceived twins (24), others have shown the opposite to be true (25). There was no data available on the acuity of illness of these infants that may have had an impact on their long-term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%