2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jc015610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Quantifying Air‐Water Carbon Dioxide Flux Using Estuarine Water Quality Data: Case Study for Chesapeake Bay

Abstract: Estuaries play an uncertain but potentially important role in the global carbon cycle via CO2 outgassing. The uncertainty mainly stems from the paucity of studies that document the full spatial and temporal variability of estuarine surface water partial pressure of carbon dioxide ( pCO2). Here, we explore the potential of utilizing the abundance of pH data from historical water quality monitoring programs to fill the data void via a case study of the mainstem Chesapeake Bay (eastern United States). We calculat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability in biological modifications and seawater chemistry, rather than changing atmospheric CO 2 , explains the spatiotemporal patterns of decadal changes in the Chesapeake Bay surface carbonate system. In the summer and in the middle Bay, surface DIC and p CO 2 levels are lower than other seasons and regions due to high primary production (Brodeur et al., 2019; Friedman et al., 2020; Herrmann et al., 2020). For a seasonally uniform increase in atmospheric CO 2 , there can be more uptake of CO 2 in the summer and in the middle Bay where there is a biologically driven undersaturation of p CO 2 relative to the atmosphere, which leads to greater increases in surface DIC (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Variability in biological modifications and seawater chemistry, rather than changing atmospheric CO 2 , explains the spatiotemporal patterns of decadal changes in the Chesapeake Bay surface carbonate system. In the summer and in the middle Bay, surface DIC and p CO 2 levels are lower than other seasons and regions due to high primary production (Brodeur et al., 2019; Friedman et al., 2020; Herrmann et al., 2020). For a seasonally uniform increase in atmospheric CO 2 , there can be more uptake of CO 2 in the summer and in the middle Bay where there is a biologically driven undersaturation of p CO 2 relative to the atmosphere, which leads to greater increases in surface DIC (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more challenging to compare the results of this modeling study with existing observationally derived trends. For example, a change in measurement protocols around 1996 prohibits a comparison of pH data collected before and after this date (see Herrmann et al., 2020 for details). The analysis in the present study thus avoids using pH data from those early years, but there remains a possibility that the change in methodology after 1996 contributed to artificially high pH values in the lower Chesapeake Bay in the analyses of Waldbusser et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the complicated non-linear dependence of CO 2 flux on the wind speed and strong spatial variability make it difficult to identify a simple relationship between the CO 2 flux and wind forcing in this estuary. Although numerical model estimates of airsea@ CO 2 flux can help overcome challenges in making similar estimates from limited and error-prone observations (Herrmann et al, 2020), assigning causation to these changes under dynamic physical forcing is difficult even with model simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%