2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iedm13553.2020.9371962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and perspectives in the modeling of spin qubits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are significant challenges in the development of such a Quantum Computer‐Aided Design (QCAD) framework. [ 232 ] The k·p method, commonly used to describe the single‐electron/hole properties of QDs, cannot describe the valley splitting and SOC associated with atomic‐level features. Its accuracy is also subject to question, with higher‐order corrections to the Luttinger Hamiltonian potentially revealing new sweet spots for hole spin dephasing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are significant challenges in the development of such a Quantum Computer‐Aided Design (QCAD) framework. [ 232 ] The k·p method, commonly used to describe the single‐electron/hole properties of QDs, cannot describe the valley splitting and SOC associated with atomic‐level features. Its accuracy is also subject to question, with higher‐order corrections to the Luttinger Hamiltonian potentially revealing new sweet spots for hole spin dephasing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niquet et al discussed the challenges and perspectives in modeling spin qubits [213]. In particular, the authors make the case for establishing quantum computer-aided design as the key required simulation-based toolchain which will enable the success of solid-state based quantum information processing platforms.…”
Section: Quantum Dots and Spin Qubitsmentioning
confidence: 99%