2018
DOI: 10.1007/s42107-018-0040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation of hemispherical domes: structural flexibility and interference factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the interaction of adjacent structures in determining the wind force of the design of the structures, the ʻ interference factor ʼ, (dif) is defined in Equation (9). In this equation, parameters Cpk and Cp0k are wind pressure coefficient in the presence and absence of interference source(s), respectively (per measurement points, n).…”
Section: Interference Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the interaction of adjacent structures in determining the wind force of the design of the structures, the ʻ interference factor ʼ, (dif) is defined in Equation (9). In this equation, parameters Cpk and Cp0k are wind pressure coefficient in the presence and absence of interference source(s), respectively (per measurement points, n).…”
Section: Interference Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak pressure coefficients of closed dome roofs were compared with the current Japanese wind load code after examining the characteristics of the medium and peak pressure coefficients. Also, Sadeghi et al [9] simulated hemispherical domes and investigated the influence of the flexibility coefficient on shape factor, comparing the results with those obtained in a wind tunnel. Using numerical modeling based on computational fluid dynamics, Sadeghi et al [10] presented wind pressure coefficients on scalp domes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of wind pressure distribution on an object is not only a function of its shape but is also a function of the effect of the nearby objects, according to [3]. Thus, this effect was studied, as well as the Venturi effect and the blowing effect on the external pressure coefficient between the cups.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the insertion of a slot into a spherical dome caused an abrupt change in its wind pressure coefficient in the vicinity of this slot. Sadeghi, Heristchian, Aziminejad, and Nooshin [3] compared the numerical results with those obtained from the wind tunnel available in the literature. Then, numerically, the effect of structural flexibility and the neighborhood of the objects on the wind pressure distribution coefficients are studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sadeghi et al 10 obtained wind effect on scallop domes with curve shape code 1 (mentioned above), indicating that it has the maximum effect with the ridge vertical to the wind. Sadeghi et al 11 also studied the flexibility coefficient effect on shape coefficient (C p ) by simulating semi-spherical domes, and compared the results with wind tunnel test results. Recently, Cao and Tamura 12 conducted an LES study on a wall-mounted hemisphere floating in a boundary layer flow with Re = 7, which included critical and supercritical flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%