2005
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2002.018937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Aims: To study the relation between risk of cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status. Methods: A total of 293 children with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy out of 105 760 live births between 1 January 1982 and 31 December 1997 were identified from the special conditions sub-file of the West Sussex Computerised Child Health System. Results: There was a linear association between risk of cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status (SES) measured by the Registrar General's social class (RGSC) and enumeration district (E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
61
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between SES and CP is not yet clear, however, it is believed that this association may suggest etiological factors and ways for prevention (13) , as well as impairments to motor development. Knowledge of the CP motor performance, from the analysis of the socioeconomic context, may represent an important tool for decision making in resource management and in the planning of services for these children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between SES and CP is not yet clear, however, it is believed that this association may suggest etiological factors and ways for prevention (13) , as well as impairments to motor development. Knowledge of the CP motor performance, from the analysis of the socioeconomic context, may represent an important tool for decision making in resource management and in the planning of services for these children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• access to a full continuum of health care without discrimination on the basis of (1) insurance, refugee, and/or immigration status, 51-58 (2) disabilities, 33,36,46 and/or (3) placement in foster care, the juvenile justice system, or other public venues 43,44,49,50 ;…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If health disparities in the United States were eliminated, such that all children had the same risks of adverse outcomes as those of the most economically privileged, the prevalence of poor outcomes (eg, low birth weight, cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities, psychological problems, child abuse, disabilities attributable to intentional and unintentional injuries) would be reduced by 60% to 70%. [32][33][34][35][36][37] Inequities in children's health also lead to disparities in adult health and wellbeing. [15][16][17][18][19] These inequities contribute to chronic adult illnesses and to the intergenerational perpetuation of poverty and ill health found in many communities (eg, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, poor educational outcomes, unemployment, poverty, early death, etc).…”
Section: Why Do Health Disparities In Children Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In West Sussex, England, low socioeconomic status was associated with elevated risk of cerebral palsy, and adjustment for birth weight and gestational age did not account for this increased risk. 8 The mechanism by which socioeconomic status and race interact to impact an individual's risk of cerebral palsy has not been adequately studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In West Sussex, England, low socioeconomic status was associated with elevated risk of cerebral palsy, and adjustment for birth weight and gestational age did not account for this increased risk. 8 The mechanism by which socioeconomic status and race interact to impact an individual's risk of cerebral palsy has not been adequately studied. To assess the relationship between ethnicity and low birth weight with respect to the prevalence of cerebral palsy, and to determine whether socioeconomic status impacts the risk of cerebral palsy within racial/ethnic groups, we studied a large, multiethnic population in California.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%