Ceramic Veneers and Direct-Composite Cases of Amelogenesis Imperfecta Rehabilitation

Shibata, S; Taguchi, Cmc; Gondo, Renata; Stolf, SC

doi:10.2341/15-079-t

Cited by 16 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Shibata, Taguchi, Gondo, Stolf, and Baratieri () compared ceramic veneers and direct composite in AI rehabilitation. They concluded that the selection criteria for the two different materials used in rehabilitation of AI patients depends on (a) disorder type and severity, (b) patient age, (c) esthetic demand, (d) treatment longevity, (e) presence or absence of parafunctional habits, (f????????)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques

Ohrvik

Hjortsjö

2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical success and satisfaction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with three different types of bonded restorations at a university clinic. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty‐four restorations in 15 subjects with mean age of 17.3 years (SD 8.2) were evaluated after treatment with three different types of bonded restorations: all ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, prefabricated composite veneers, and direct composite resin restorations. A modified version of the Californian Dental Association system for quality evaluation of dental care and a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction were used for classification. The restorations were evaluated with respect to patient satisfaction, esthetics, technical, and biological complications. Results Mean observation period for the restorations was 42.5 months (SD 35.6). All restorations were in place at the time of the examination. Surface and color calibration showed a success of 95% for the ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, 44% for the direct composite resin restorations, and 0% for the prefabricated composite veneers. The same pattern was evident for anatomy and marginal integrity. The subjects reported a high degree of satisfaction with both the esthetics and function of their restorations. Conclusion The results indicated that all ceramic restorations demonstrated the best results for patients with amelogenesis imperfecta.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Proper diagnosis and good treatment planning are fundamental to obtaining a satisfactory result for rehabilitation of patients with AI (Shibata et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques

Ohrvik

Hjortsjö

2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, there are reports of failure in the resin adhered to enamel and/or dentine. Newer adhesive systems seem to correct these failures and thus it is necessary to choose the most adequate materials …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral alterations in patients with cystinosis

Tuma

Ordóñez-Aguilera

Rodriguez

et al. 2019

Special Care in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cystinosis is a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder, which leads to abnormal accumulation of cysteine in various organs, including progressive dysfunction of kidneys. The most severe and frequent form, affecting ∼95% of patients, is termed infantile nephropathic cystinosis (NC) (OMIM 219800). We have reported oral findings in two patients with NC and described esthetic and functional rehabilitation in one of them. The first case describes a 16‐year‐old male patient, who was diagnosed with NC when he was 1‐year‐old. The patient exhibited generalized enamel hypoplasia, grade 1 drug‐induced gingival overgrowth, caries lesion in molar tooth and supernumerary tooth (ie, distomolar). The second case describes a 14‐year‐old male patient diagnosed with NC at 3 years old. Clinical examination revealed generalized enamel hypoplasia and grade 1 drug‐induced gingival overgrowth. Radiographic examination showed supernumerary tooth (mesiodens). The treatment included gingivoplasty and restoration with direct composite resin. The severity of hypoplasia highlights the importance of a dental rehabilitation treatment, as proposed here. Direct restoration with composite resin allowed harmony, function, and esthetics to be restored, in addition to being a rapid and low‐cost technique.

show abstract

“…This performance was based on the following parameters: marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and anatomy [22]. It should be noted that the repair of composite should be the treatment of choice when it is clinically indicated, since it is a minimally invasive treatment that can increase consistently longevity of the restoration [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The success of direct adhesive restorations depends directly on the formation and stability of an excellent hybrid layer [23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Direct techniques using composite resins require the surgeon ability [5]. Some techniques are described using the diagnostic wax-up and silicone palatine guides to lead them to simulate the aesthetic of work and occlusal function pre-establishment during planning [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conservative Technique for Restoration of Anterior Teeth: Clinical Case Report

Novais¹

2017

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work aims to present a technique for resolving cases with aesthetic requirements using guides that facilitates the implementation of restorative procedures without the need for high manual sculpture skill to dental professional and reduced time. Fractures and wear tooth, poor dental position, trauma and dissatisfaction aesthetics are the major causes of seeking patients by the dentist. All these problems could be rehabilitated with indirect or direct restorations. The choice of the ideal material should consider some factors, such as the rehabilitation area, space available, the aesthetical potential of each material, the translucency of the adjacent teeth, type of reminiscent and antagonist that occlude with the new restoration. Direct restorations have good predictability, resistance load, longevity and compared with indirect restorations have greater preservation of dental tissues, low cost and fewer clinical sessions. However, restorative aesthetic works mainly require skill and practice of the dentist. The clinical case shows an alternative technique for performing aesthetic rehabilitation treatment with direct restorations with resin composite. The described technique was an excellent choice to ensure proper sculpture and anatomy of the anterior teeth. Respecting the principles of adhesion and operative procedures for performing direct restorations was possible to obtain an aesthetic and functional result favorable in less time.

show abstract

Ceramic Veneers and Direct-Composite Cases of Amelogenesis Imperfecta Rehabilitation

Cited by 16 publications

References 15 publications

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques

Oral alterations in patients with cystinosis

Conservative Technique for Restoration of Anterior Teeth: Clinical Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About