1989
DOI: 10.1185/03007998909110135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceftriaxone versus clavulanate-potentiated amoxycillin for prophylaxis against post-operative sepsis in biliary surgery: A prospective randomized study in 200 patients

Abstract: A prospective study was carried out in 200 consecutive patients undergoing biliary surgery to compare the prophylactic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and clavulanate-potentiated (CP-) amoxycillin. Patients were assigned in a randomized fashion to two groups and received ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously pre-operatively), or CP-amoxycillin (1200 mg, to be repeated for 2 more doses in the case of patients undergoing procedures other than elective cholecystectomy). Post-operative wound infection occurred in 4% of pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…injection are higher than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (>MIC) for most Gram-negative bacteria usually isolated in the bile. Such results are similar to those reported with ceftriaxone, which is considered the gold-standard for biliary tract surgery 24 .…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Clean-contaminated Abdominal Surgesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…injection are higher than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (>MIC) for most Gram-negative bacteria usually isolated in the bile. Such results are similar to those reported with ceftriaxone, which is considered the gold-standard for biliary tract surgery 24 .…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Clean-contaminated Abdominal Surgesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here again cefepime has been shown to be advantageous in terms of effectiveness, bacterial resistance and cost-benefit analysis [21][22][23] . Similar results were reported at the end of '80 using ceftriaxone 24 . We have underlined that pancreatic surgery (not for acute necrotic pancreatitis) belongs to this class of operations and that short-ter m antibiotic prophylaxis may be enough, provided that the antibiotic is one of those with good penetration into human pancreas [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Downloaded By [Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi] At 15:10 04 Apsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is noteworthy that significantly fewer cases of pneumonia were observed on ceftriaxone prophylaxis -a result demonstrated for single-dose prophylaxis hitherto only in studies with 24-hour cover by a long-acting, broad-spectrum antibiotic [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, the fact that respiratory and urinary tract infections are not effectively reduced by a short prophylaxis of 2-4 h [28,29] should not tempt surgeons into prescribing perioperative antibiotics for more than 24 h. Administration beyond this period is not only unnecessary for prophylaxis but also potentially dangerous, since increased selective pressure may favor the development of resistant bacterial strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for elective and emergency interventions in visceral surgery has been sufficiently demonstrated by numerous studies and is the generally accepted norm [1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10]. When antibiotic prophylaxis is able to reduce post-operative infectious complications significantly, this always entails considerable savings in costs [4, 11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%