1997
DOI: 10.5006/1.3280438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitation Corrosion of Duplex Stainless Steel in Seawater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On comparing the OCP trend of the two materials when undergoing cavitation, it can be seen that while NAB reaches stability at -210 mV at a lower voltage as compared to DSS, the stability of DSS attained after the rig is switched on is much lower than that of NAB showing that NAB has higher corrosion resistance than DSS. Similar to the results observed by Al-Hashem et al [24], there was a shift in corrosion potential for DSS under cavitation in the active direction by 75 mV; however, there was not a very substantial shift in case of NAB. This may be due to the experimental reproducibility since several tests were conducted giving similar results.…”
Section: Surface Profilometry and Morphologysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On comparing the OCP trend of the two materials when undergoing cavitation, it can be seen that while NAB reaches stability at -210 mV at a lower voltage as compared to DSS, the stability of DSS attained after the rig is switched on is much lower than that of NAB showing that NAB has higher corrosion resistance than DSS. Similar to the results observed by Al-Hashem et al [24], there was a shift in corrosion potential for DSS under cavitation in the active direction by 75 mV; however, there was not a very substantial shift in case of NAB. This may be due to the experimental reproducibility since several tests were conducted giving similar results.…”
Section: Surface Profilometry and Morphologysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Specimen cross-sections revealed microcracks at the bottom of the cavities initiating from the ferrite matrix with crack propagation impeded by the austenite islands, branching along the parallel slip systems. They also observed an active shift in the free corrosion potential by about 140 mV when cavitation was applied, with a slight increase in the cathodic and anodic currents, shifting the corrosion potential in the noble direction by 75 mV [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the surface is impacted by high speed microjet formed in the cavitating liquid, the material deforms at high strain rate [8]. Such deformation causes easier ferrite fracture and removal from the surface than that of austenite because the face-centered cubic (fcc) structure has low sensitivity to the strain rate [9]. So it can be found that ferrite is more prone to removal from the eroded surface than austenite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The phenomenon consists of the continuous collapse of numerous bubbles due to localized pressure changes at high-velocity fl ow. [1][2] This collapse is accompanied by the sudden fl ow of liquid, which originates stress pulses that can cause plastic deformation on solid surfaces. The magnitude of the impact stress may be as high as 1,000 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%