2007
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2007.159426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of repeated remodeling of left ventricle after Dor procedure

Abstract: Thus, a combination of the foregoing features is a morphological predictor of postoperative heart remodeling in patients with ICMP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, late after SVR, LV remodeling recured as the level of the rats without SVR. These findings do not conflict with the clinical reports of SVR [12,13].…”
Section: Attenuation Of Recurrence Of LV Remodeling After Svrsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, late after SVR, LV remodeling recured as the level of the rats without SVR. These findings do not conflict with the clinical reports of SVR [12,13].…”
Section: Attenuation Of Recurrence Of LV Remodeling After Svrsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In other studies, one of the concerns has been reported to be recurrence of LV remodeling after SVR [12,13]. These studies demonstrated that LV size increased again at 1 year after SVR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 , 11 In most cases, the cause of repeated postoperative LV remodeling is myocardial inflammation. 10 , 11 Nevertheless, with a careful analysis of the history of SVR technique development, attention is drawn to the observance of normal geometry and structure of the heart, thereby showing that the best results are achieved when the SVR procedure is aimed at restoring the elliptical shape, and not just at a smaller size and volume of the LV. 3 , 4 , 8 At the same time, indications for SVR should also be carefully considered, and an individual approach should be taken in each case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%