1994
DOI: 10.1016/0967-0637(94)90075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and consequences of variability in the timing of spring phytoplankton blooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
137
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these locations, the spring bloom develops relatively early, consistent with spring in situ data from Georges Bank ) that show increasing chlorophyll concentrations and nutrient utilization as early as February or even January (Townsend and Thomas, 2002). In these regions, bathymetry restricts the depth of vertical mixing, reducing light limitation and allowing the spring bloom to begin early (Townsend et al, 1994). Along the coast of Maine, strong vertical mixing throughout the year in the EMCC brings nutrients to the surface (Townsend et al, 1987) supporting elevated chlorophyll concentrations that are advected southwest along the coast, with maximum concentrations developing offshore of the Penobscot Bay region near the terminus of the strongest flow (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In these locations, the spring bloom develops relatively early, consistent with spring in situ data from Georges Bank ) that show increasing chlorophyll concentrations and nutrient utilization as early as February or even January (Townsend and Thomas, 2002). In these regions, bathymetry restricts the depth of vertical mixing, reducing light limitation and allowing the spring bloom to begin early (Townsend et al, 1994). Along the coast of Maine, strong vertical mixing throughout the year in the EMCC brings nutrients to the surface (Townsend et al, 1987) supporting elevated chlorophyll concentrations that are advected southwest along the coast, with maximum concentrations developing offshore of the Penobscot Bay region near the terminus of the strongest flow (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Walsh and McRoy (1986) interpreted the presence of a sub-surface chlorophyll maximum in the middle domain as evidence of transfer of phytoplankton to the benthos, and a lack of tight coupling between primary production and copepod grazing. They hypothesized that the fate of production in the southeastern Bering Sea is influenced by water temperature, since phytoplankton growth is less sensitive to water temperature than is zooplankton growth (see also Vidal, 1980;Vidal and Smith, 1986;Townsend et al, 1994). Water temperature exerts a strong influence on the growth rates of zooplankton, and is often thought of as more important than food availability for limiting the growth rates of smallbodied copepods (McLaren, 1963;Corkett and Fig.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Change In Zooplankton Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the timing and magnitude of the bloom affect the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels (Townsend et al, 1994). The match/mismatch hypothesis between predator and prey cycles states that the survival of higher trophic levels with time-varying life stages depends on food availability at critical periods (Conover et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%