2020
DOI: 10.1111/poms.13109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category Captainship in the Presence of Retail Competition

Abstract: Category captainship (CC) is a supply chain practice in which a retailer collaborates with a manufacturer to develop and implement a category management strategy. We examine the role of retail competition in CC implementations by analyzing a game‐theoretic setting with two competing retailers. We first consider a benchmark model in which both retailers adopt traditional category management. Then, we consider a CC model in which the focal retailer implements CC. Comparing the equilibrium outcomes of these two m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying S-D logic demonstrates how the collaborative and co-operative challenges inherent in the CC system can be re-structured and reframed. Transforming the current highly competitive RCM and CC environment (Nakkas et al, 2020) by moving from the individual capabilities and goals of individual CCs onto developing a more effective category service eco-system for all actors (Sands et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Implications: S-d Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying S-D logic demonstrates how the collaborative and co-operative challenges inherent in the CC system can be re-structured and reframed. Transforming the current highly competitive RCM and CC environment (Nakkas et al, 2020) by moving from the individual capabilities and goals of individual CCs onto developing a more effective category service eco-system for all actors (Sands et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Implications: S-d Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature in marketing and operations management has looked at captainship arrangements where duties focus on (i) price‐related decisions such as pricing and promotional schedules (Kurtuluş & Toktay, 2005; Nijs et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2003), (ii) assortment decisions (Alan et al., 2017; Kurtuluş & Nakkas, 2011; Kurtuluş et al., 2014; Nakkas et al., 2020; Viswanathan et al., 2021), or (iii) nonprice demand‐enhancing decisions such as the allocation of promotional shelf space and shelf organization (Kurtuluş et al., 2014; Kurtuluş & Toktay, 2011; Özer et al., 2018; Subramanian et al., 2010; Wright, 2009). The findings provide evidence that retailers can benefit from captainship arrangements despite concerns about captain' s opportunism and rival suppliers' push‐back (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2009; Gooner et al., 2011; Gruen & Shah, 2000; Lindblom & Olkkonen, 2006; Morgan et al., 2007; Özer et al., 2018; Subramanian et al., 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…many different breakfast cereals) (Huffman and Kahn, 1998; Morales et al. , 2005; Nakkas et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a certain breakfast cereal), or a variety of substitute products from within the same category (e.g. many different breakfast cereals) (Huffman and Kahn, 1998;Morales et al, 2005;Nakkas et al, 2020). By contrast, shopper solutions offer an assortment of complementary products that are also most often cross-categorical in nature (a display of breakfast cereals, pastries, jams fruits, assorted juices, etc.…”
Section: Ijlm 346mentioning
confidence: 99%