2008
DOI: 10.1080/10911360802087358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cataloging 2.0: Metadata Research and Initiatives at a Community College Library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Lyons and Tappeiner wrote that they were incorporating user-developed tags into a local thesaurus for video games and web resources at Hostos Community College Library. 43 Staff at Westchester County Public Library System created subject headings and general material designations to enhance catalog records for their collection of audiovisual materials. 44 Lee et al developed a video game metadata schema for the Seattle Interactive Media Museum and included the elements of "genre/gameplay, style, plot/narrative, theme, setting, and mood/affect."…”
Section: Cataloging Tabletop Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Lyons and Tappeiner wrote that they were incorporating user-developed tags into a local thesaurus for video games and web resources at Hostos Community College Library. 43 Staff at Westchester County Public Library System created subject headings and general material designations to enhance catalog records for their collection of audiovisual materials. 44 Lee et al developed a video game metadata schema for the Seattle Interactive Media Museum and included the elements of "genre/gameplay, style, plot/narrative, theme, setting, and mood/affect."…”
Section: Cataloging Tabletop Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Folksonomies have become an important user‐driven approach to information indexing and retrieval (Dye, 2006; Furnas et al 2006; Golder and Huberman, 2006; Gordon‐Murnane, 2006; Guy and Tonkin, 2006; Kroski, 2008; Mathes, 2004; Noruzi, 2006; Peterson, 2006; Smith, 2008; Spiteri, 2006, 2007). They find application in:collaborative web services such as Del.icio.us, Flickr, Last.fm and YouTube (Peters and Stock, 2007, 2008);library catalogs, e.g., PennTags (Sweda, 2006; Allen and Winkler, 2007), or “cataloguing 2.0” (Lyons and Tappeiner, 2008; Fifarek, 2008; Coyle, 2007; Weaver, 2007);corporate intranets (Fichter, 2006);museum catalogs (Trant, 2006); andcommercial online information suppliers, e.g., Elsevier's Engineering Village and GENIOS' WISO (Stock, 2007b). The strength of this approach is collaborative indexing; its weakness lies in information retrieval, as in most cases no relevance ranking exists (for a remarkable exception see Hotho et al (2006), and their system “BibSonomy”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…library catalogs, e.g., PennTags (Sweda, 2006; Allen and Winkler, 2007), or “cataloguing 2.0” (Lyons and Tappeiner, 2008; Fifarek, 2008; Coyle, 2007; Weaver, 2007);…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In "Game Genres Demystified," McCann also acknowledges the lack of standardized criteria for defining game genres, stating that the unofficial list is contentious and changing. 32 Nevertheless, he identifies major categories for use in collection development and event programming.…”
Section: Prior Work On Access To Video Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%