2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-006-6775-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-based heuristic selection for timetabling problems

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a case-based heuristic selection approach for automated university course and exam timetabling. The method described in this paper is motivated by the goal of developing timetabling systems that are fundamentally more general than the current state of the art. Heuristics that worked well in previous similar situations are memorized in a case base and are retrieved for solving the problem in hand. Knowledge discovery techniques are employed in two distinct scenarios. Firstly, we model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Constructive hyper-heuristics construct solutions from "scratch" by intelligently calling different heuristics at different stages in the construction process. Examples of constructive hyperheuristic research can be seen in (Fisher and Thompson 1963, Kitano 1990, Hart, Ross and Nelson 1998, Burke, Petrovic and Qu 2006, Burke et al 2007). Local search hyper-heuristics start from a complete initial solution and repeatedly select appropriate heuristics to lead the search in promising new directions.…”
Section: Hyper-heuristics: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constructive hyper-heuristics construct solutions from "scratch" by intelligently calling different heuristics at different stages in the construction process. Examples of constructive hyperheuristic research can be seen in (Fisher and Thompson 1963, Kitano 1990, Hart, Ross and Nelson 1998, Burke, Petrovic and Qu 2006, Burke et al 2007). Local search hyper-heuristics start from a complete initial solution and repeatedly select appropriate heuristics to lead the search in promising new directions.…”
Section: Hyper-heuristics: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other search methods which have been employed as hyper-heuristics include ant systems , choice functions (Cowling, Kendall andSoubeiga 2001, Rattadilok et al, 2005) and case-based reasoning (Burke, Petrovic and Qu 2006).…”
Section: Hyper-heuristics: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a metaheuristics is used to search a space of heuristics). Other approaches, not considered as metaheuristics, can and have been used as the high-level strategy in hyper-heuristics such as reinforcement learning [31,37,81,88], case-based reasoning [24] and learning classifier systems [98,112].…”
Section: Hyper-heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selection hyper-heuristics, the framework is provided with a set of pre-existing (generally problem-specific) constructive heuristics, and the challenge is to select the heuristic that is somehow the most suitable for the current problem state. This type of approach has been successfully applied to hard combinatorial optimisation problems such as cutting and packing [98,112], educational timetabling [23,24,97] and production scheduling [25,43]. In the case of generation hyper-heuristics, the idea is to combine sub-components of previously existing constructive heuristics to produce new constructive heuristic.…”
Section: Hyper-heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid approaches involving combinations of heuristics and metaheuristics such as genetic algorithms and hill climbing techniques [10,11] have produced good results on benchmark datasets. Other successful approaches taken include multi-criteria approaches [12], constraint based techniques [13], case based reasoning [14], and recently hyper-heuristics [15]. Recent papers note that on the whole, methods used to tackle the examination problem tend to use problem specific information and heuristics in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%