2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier phase prediction method for GNSS precise positioning in challenging environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of path planning for mobile robots is to find an optimal collision-free path from a starting point to a target point [25], however the high-cost of the technology used for these systems make the real and systematic application in the field difficult. Moreover, the signals of GNSS devices are blocked frequently in challenging environments, and the discontinuous carrier phases seriously affect the application of GNSS precise positioning reducing the adoption of these systems [26]. Robot mowers that move randomly are indeed nowadays largely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of path planning for mobile robots is to find an optimal collision-free path from a starting point to a target point [25], however the high-cost of the technology used for these systems make the real and systematic application in the field difficult. Moreover, the signals of GNSS devices are blocked frequently in challenging environments, and the discontinuous carrier phases seriously affect the application of GNSS precise positioning reducing the adoption of these systems [26]. Robot mowers that move randomly are indeed nowadays largely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard deviation of INS, GNSS without predictor, and GNSS/INS with KNN predictor can be seen in Table 1, when the GNSS receiver with and without blocking in a few seconds. In References [13][14][15], different algorithm predictors to predict the output values of GPS were used, while, in this paper, a new algorithm was used to predict GNSS output values. Figures 5-7 and Table 1 show the main results of this new method.…”
Section: Scenario (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in this paper show that WNNs are more efficient than RBFNNs. Additionally, a carrier phase prediction method on baseband signal processing level to solve GNSS blocking signals in challenging environments was proposed in Reference [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated navigation based on information fusion and prediction algorithms is more advantageous than individual navigation systems [3,4]. Although the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has higher positioning accuracy than other positioning methods, it is susceptible to various interferences such as multipath effects which include radar, electromagnetic interference, and signal blocks [5,6], contrary to a single-antenna GNSS/Strap-down integrated navigation system (SINS) [7]. An enhanced method for single-antenna Global Position System (GPS) based attitude determination is proposed [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the vehicle moves linearly, the gyro of the INS does not work, the heading angle gradually diverges, and there is a large error in the heading observation of the GNSS. Multi-baseline GNSS can determine attitude by using carrier-phase differential technology [5,9,10]. However, multi-antenna GNSS has a high-cost and complicated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%