2010
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2010.5534588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier aggregation framework in 3GPP LTE-advanced [WiMAX/LTE Update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
134
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several papers in the literature explain practical considerations to achieve desired performance levels in networks, such as deployment options, implementation frameworks, and challenges in the physical layer [6][7][8]. The work by Shen et al [15] provides an overview on all layers, while also underlining the interest of several major U.S. providers in the technology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several papers in the literature explain practical considerations to achieve desired performance levels in networks, such as deployment options, implementation frameworks, and challenges in the physical layer [6][7][8]. The work by Shen et al [15] provides an overview on all layers, while also underlining the interest of several major U.S. providers in the technology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The policy ruling is facilitated by a central feature of LTE-Advanced networks (as defined in 3GPP Release 10 and beyond) called carrier aggregation [6][7][8][9]. Carrier aggregation allows service providers to aggregate contiguous or non-contiguous component carriers up to 100 MHz total bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General aspects and performance analysis of CA are detailed in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. CA can improve the performance of the frequency domain scheduling.…”
Section: Technical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario can be expected in countries where spectrum allocation is noncontiguous within a single band, when the middle carriers are loaded with other users, or when network sharing is considered. Therefore this model would fit operators in North America or Europe, who have fragmental spectrum in one band or share the same cellular network [5].…”
Section: Intra-band Aggregation With Noncontiguous Component Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%