2012
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.11-050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Emissions and Sequestration from Fertilization of Pine in the Southeastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reductions in fertilizer applications on a regional scale are likely a result of high material prices [33]. At the same time, urea prices (the most common form of nitrogen used in forestry application) can fluctuate by large amounts in relatively short periods of time [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in fertilizer applications on a regional scale are likely a result of high material prices [33]. At the same time, urea prices (the most common form of nitrogen used in forestry application) can fluctuate by large amounts in relatively short periods of time [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the size of the actively managed loblolly pine plantation resource and its responsiveness to silviculture, management can be modified to increase regionwide ecosystem carbon sequestration, especially when gains in ecosystem carbon align with increased stem growth or efficiency of fertilizer use. For instance, an additional 8 Tg CO2 equivalents year is sequestered due to application of N and P fertilizer to loblolly pine plantations [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Scott and Perry (2008) document emissions of 0.09 tonnes of carbon equivalent per acre from manufacture and 0.003 tonnes of carbon equivalent from transportation and application of fertilizer. However, the available evidence suggests that emissions from production and transportation are low relative to the additional sequestration generated by fertilization (Scott and Perry 2008;Albaugh et al 2012).…”
Section: Carbon Sequestration Baseline and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 98%