The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon emission reduction behavior strategies in the shipping industry under government regulation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al [32] studied the relationship between government intervention and low-carbon innovation technology by constructing a three-way evolutionary model. Meng et al [33] built a three-way evolutionary model between the government and the shipping industry, analyzing the impact of government regulation on energy-saving and emission reduction strategies in the shipping industry. Yuan et al [34] analyzed the relationship between the government and prefabricated housing construction by constructing a three-way evolutionary model, proposing a mechanism for promoting prefabricated housing construction.…”
Section: The Application Of Evolutionary Game Theory In the Steel Ind...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhou et al [32] studied the relationship between government intervention and low-carbon innovation technology by constructing a three-way evolutionary model. Meng et al [33] built a three-way evolutionary model between the government and the shipping industry, analyzing the impact of government regulation on energy-saving and emission reduction strategies in the shipping industry. Yuan et al [34] analyzed the relationship between the government and prefabricated housing construction by constructing a three-way evolutionary model, proposing a mechanism for promoting prefabricated housing construction.…”
Section: The Application Of Evolutionary Game Theory In the Steel Ind...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify the analysis and incorporate currency unit exchange rates, the initial value of the Chinese carbon price (CP) is set to 0.083. The values for the government's proactive response to the CBAM political gains (Vg) and high-carbon implicit losses (F) are abstract and determined through consultation with government experts and literature research [33,60]. The government's tax refund subsidies for enterprises, E i (i = 1, 2), are set based on the research data from Wang [61] and Chang et al [62].…”
Section: Parameter Sources and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argued that government subsidies and input-output ratios were critical for enterprises to collaborate on air-pollution-control investments. Meng et al [27] constructed a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the government, port enterprises, and shipping enterprises, and analyzed the evolution of the carbon-emission-reduction strategy. They found that an increase in government subsidies for shipping enterprises would lead to a decrease in the additional costs of positive emission reduction.…”
Section: Evolutionary Game On Carbon-emission Reduction Between Gover...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For convenience of description, this case is named Case 1. Based on the behavior patterns of various parties during the low-carbon transformation process, this article assigns values to parameters with reference to the relevant parameter settings in carbon reduction-related research [33][34][35]. Suppose that the government's supervision cost C 1 = 40, the enterprise's low−carbon transformation cost C 2 = 70, the verification cost of the verification organization C 3 = 20, the comprehensive income brought by the enterprise s low-carbon transformation strategy V 1 = 120, the income of maintaining the status quo V 2 = 110, the low-carbon subsidy given by the government to the enterprise S = 30, the verification remuneration given by the government to the verification organization W = 40, and the penalty charged by the government when the enterprise maintains the status quo F 1 = 20.…”
Section: Tripartite Negative Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%